We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING:
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour.
Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Completing purchase with pending TP1
I'm currently selling my house and we're otherwise ready to proceed, but a historic boundary correction and pending TP1 application is causing a problem.
In 2023, it was discovered that the fence between my property and my neighbour's had originally been built in the wrong place. To correct this, I transferred a very small strip of land from my title to my neighbour using a TP1. The transfer completed in 2023 and the boundary/fence has been treated accordingly ever since.
Unfortunately, my neighbour's failed to register the TP1 with Land Registry at the time. They eventually submitted it recently, while my current house sale was already progressing.
HMLR has now raised three requisitions, 2 of which are resolved. The other one relates to the existing mortgage charge over my title. (I subsequently remortgaged so my current lender has a charge over the existing title, including the strip that was transferred)
The third point is now causing the difficulty.
My current solicitor has started the process of getting the bank to release/discharge their charge from the small piece of land transferred in 2023, however we are unsure of how long this will take. However, we're also about to sell the entire property, at which point the HSBC mortgage will be redeemed and its charge over the whole title discharged anyway.
My understanding is therefore that, following completion of my sale, the bank's charge causing the TP1 requisition would cease to exist. The discharge could then be provided to the solicitor/HMLR to satisfy the outstanding requisition and allow the TP1 registration to complete.
The suggestion being considered is therefore that my buyer completes the purchase while the TP1 application remains pending, with my solicitor giving an undertaking to provide the lender's discharge to Conveyancing / Land Registry advice needed – pending TP1 holding up house sale
The difficulty is that the buyer's solicitor is advsing that this would be unacceptable to the lender
I'm trying to understand:
- Is completing the sale while the TP1 remains pending, backed by a solicitor's undertaking regarding the discharge, a reasonable conveyancing solution?
- Would redemption of the mortgage on completion normally satisfy the substance of HMLR's charge requisition?
- Is there any other practical mechanism (retention, indemnity, undertaking etc.) that could give the buyer/buyer's lender sufficient protection to allow completion?
The frustrating part is that the underlying land transfer isn't disputed by anybody, the TP1 was signed and completed in 2023 and relates to a tiny boundary strip. The issue exists because it wasn't registered at the time and has now collided with my house sale.
Any views from conveyancers/property lawyers or anyone who has dealt with something similar would be very welcome. as soon as it becomes available following completion. The TP1 could then be completed at Land Registry.
Comments
-
Sorry, no idea why that isn't acceptable to the buyers. In a straightforward transaction it's normal to rely on a solicitor's undertaking for the discharge of the mortgage, I don't see why the transfer of title makes any difference to that.
1 -
Thanks. I have a feeling it could be risk aversion on the buyer's part. I do wonder if offering a retention for a period of time would settle their fears
0 -
Your post infers it is the buyers’s lender who does not agree, it the buyer.
0 -
Whilst the sequence of events you refer to are possible in conveyancing terms if the buyer's mortgage lender says No you will have to pursue your lender for the discharge of part (form DS3)
It really doesn't matter if it's possible from your conveyancing perspective as it's the buyer's lender who has the final say. The mortgage product and offer in place simply won't allow the conveyancing to go ahead whilst the pending TP1 application is in play as that's the risk assessment attached to that specific mortgage offer.
You/your conveyancer need to chase your lender for the DS3
“Official Company Representative
I am the official company representative of Land Registry. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
