We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Britannia Parking v Mr S at Leicester County Court

MrJenkinsEsq
MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 331
100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
Forumite

Britannia Parking v Mr S - decided on the papers. Mr S didn't attend and didn't tell the court.


Judge was satisfied on landowner authority, signage, terms, and the non-entered VRM. The filed defence was called "hopeless" by the judge and addressed none of Britannia's points.


Worth noting, the judge queried the £70 fee of his own volition, and Britannia's advocate withdrew it without argument.


The advocate then got £150 hearing costs for unreasonable non-attendance plus procedural issues with Mr S's paperwork, and other costs on top. All within about 5 minutes.

£462 to Britannia for a £100 pcn! :o

I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

Comments

  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 45,045
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    Source?

    Salutary tale of the dangers of unreasonably not turning up for a court hearing. I wouldn’t be surprised if he now doesn’t pay the costs, then turns up here for help once the likes of DCBL start chasing. The £462 is getting close enough to the £600 threshold (which DCBL might push it up to) for High Court Enforcement.

    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    #Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • MrJenkinsEsq
    MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 331
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 28 August at 11:46AM

    I was in attendance as a member of the public gallery. The case was M7DP44CM BRITANNIA PARKING GROUP LIMITED T/A BRITANNIA PARKING V S[redacted] at Leicester County Court.

    I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 42,240
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    Perhaps better to have titled the thread with some reference to Britannia and the case, rather than focusing on your attendance?

  • Car1980
    Car1980 Posts: 3,730
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    edited 28 August at 12:08PM

    That's court for you.

    The same would have occurred were the roles reversed, just like they were with Gladstones not bothering last week.

    This was BW Legal presumably?

  • MrJenkinsEsq
    MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 331
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I don't know which firm but the advocate signed in as "solicitor's agent".

    I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

  • James_Poisson
    James_Poisson Posts: 1,024
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    Well Mr S brought that upon himself

  • MrJenkinsEsq
    MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 331
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    Indeed he seems to have. But I thought it was worth noting that even in a very bad circumstance for a defendant the court is still pressing on the additional £70 charges of its of volition.

    I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

  • Johnersh
    Johnersh Posts: 1,611
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    Why redact the defendant's name if the case was heard in public and may be referenced by claimant or defendants in future?

  • MrJenkinsEsq
    MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 331
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    My reasoning was permanence. The cause list is public but unindexed and gone in days, whereas a forum thread surfaces on a search of his name for years.

    I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.