We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

buying freehold of house that has had subsidence

anyone had any experience of this, and would the freehold be easier/cheaper to purchase in this instance?

Comments

  • twopenny
    twopenny Posts: 9,362
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    If it has had subsidence and been fixed - then the price would still be what someone would offer so great place, great location etc all comes into play.

    Is there the relevant paperwork on the fixing, how long ago?

    It's not an automatic that it will go for less than market price. Heck, there was a bungalow where I lived that needed the whole internal floor replacing. Lovely building went for less but only by the amount to fix the problem. Went quickly too.

    I can rise and shine - just not at the same time!

    viral kindness .....kindness is contageous pass it on

    The only normal people you know are the ones you don’t know very well


  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,777
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 13 August at 6:25AM

    Do you mean that you own a leasehold house (which has had subsidence) and you want to buy the freehold - using the 'formal' route called 'statutory enfranchisement'?

    If so, has the subsidence been fully repaired? Did the subsidence happen after the lease was granted?

    The short answer is that the subsidence probably won't make any difference to the price of the freehold.

    It's a bit complicated…

    • The legal formula for calculating the price of the freehold takes into account the 'Market Value' of the house - assuming the house is in the same condition it was when the lease was granted.

    • On one hand, the subsidence history might reduce the current 'Market Value' of the house. On the other hand, presumably it had no subsidence history when the lease was first granted.

    • But depending on the lease length, the difference in 'Market Value' between a house with or without subsidence might make very little difference to the price of the freehold anyway.

    • If the subsidence hasn't been repaired, the 'Market Value' would be assessed as though it had been repaired. (i.e. you won't get the freehold at a discount, because you've failed to repair the house)

    If you give more info about the situation, it might be possible to comment further. (Including lease length, ground rent and market value)

  • 78daniel
    78daniel Posts: 63
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    Forumite

    Least length 103 years left

    Ground rent annual £5

    Approximate value 160000

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,777
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 19 August at 1:56PM

    78daniel said

    Least length 103 years left

    Ground rent annual £5

    Approximate value 160000

    With a statutory enfranchisement on a 103 year lease, a £50k reduction in market value might reduce the the freehold price by about £300.

    The cost of the freehold might be around £3.5k to £4k, with £3k to £4k fees on top.

    So even if you got agreement that the subsidence history reduced the market value by £50k (from £160k to £110k), you'd probably only save £300 - and the costs of the extra negotiation might be higher than £300.

    And I'm not sure you'd get agreement on a reduced market value anyway.

    So the bottom line is that the subsidence history will either make no difference, or very little difference.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.