We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
buying freehold of house that has had subsidence
anyone had any experience of this, and would the freehold be easier/cheaper to purchase in this instance?
Comments
-
If it has had subsidence and been fixed - then the price would still be what someone would offer so great place, great location etc all comes into play.
Is there the relevant paperwork on the fixing, how long ago?
It's not an automatic that it will go for less than market price. Heck, there was a bungalow where I lived that needed the whole internal floor replacing. Lovely building went for less but only by the amount to fix the problem. Went quickly too.
I can rise and shine - just not at the same time!
viral kindness .....kindness is contageous pass it on
The only normal people you know are the ones you don’t know very well
1 -
Do you mean that you own a leasehold house (which has had subsidence) and you want to buy the freehold - using the 'formal' route called 'statutory enfranchisement'?
If so, has the subsidence been fully repaired? Did the subsidence happen after the lease was granted?
The short answer is that the subsidence probably won't make any difference to the price of the freehold.
It's a bit complicated…
- The legal formula for calculating the price of the freehold takes into account the 'Market Value' of the house - assuming the house is in the same condition it was when the lease was granted.
- On one hand, the subsidence history might reduce the current 'Market Value' of the house. On the other hand, presumably it had no subsidence history when the lease was first granted.
- But depending on the lease length, the difference in 'Market Value' between a house with or without subsidence might make very little difference to the price of the freehold anyway.
- If the subsidence hasn't been repaired, the 'Market Value' would be assessed as though it had been repaired. (i.e. you won't get the freehold at a discount, because you've failed to repair the house)
If you give more info about the situation, it might be possible to comment further. (Including lease length, ground rent and market value)
1 -
Least length 103 years left
Ground rent annual £5
Approximate value 160000
0 -
78daniel said
Least length 103 years left
Ground rent annual £5
Approximate value 160000
With a statutory enfranchisement on a 103 year lease, a £50k reduction in market value might reduce the the freehold price by about £300.
The cost of the freehold might be around £3.5k to £4k, with £3k to £4k fees on top.
So even if you got agreement that the subsidence history reduced the market value by £50k (from £160k to £110k), you'd probably only save £300 - and the costs of the extra negotiation might be higher than £300.
And I'm not sure you'd get agreement on a reduced market value anyway.
So the bottom line is that the subsidence history will either make no difference, or very little difference.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.1K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
