We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Why is CSH2 outperforming SONIA?
So based on the data I have over the last 6 months, SONIA has averaged 3.76% annualised.
If CSH2 was tracking it accurately, I'd therefore expect a 6 month return of 1.88% before charges. Instead, Trustnet is telling me that the actual 6 month return is 2.0%, while Freetrade (where I have my largest holding) says it's actually 2.09%
Maybe not a massive outperform to the benchmark, but just curious as to what might be driving this, especially given the synthetic nature of this ETF…?
Comments
-
Amundi Smart Overnight Return ETF is a synthetic ETF, and does not use physical replication. It uses swap contracts rather than actually putting the money in deposits. This makes it higher risk than short-term money market funds that hold physical deposits, as it introduces counterparty risk.
The synthetic structure can allow a small positive spread over SONIA. However, that can work both ways and at times create a slight underperformance.
It is also worth saying that many investors deliberately avoid synthetic ETFs for historical reasons. After the financial crisis, regulators and commentators raised concerns about counterparty and collateral risks in swap‑based ETF structures, and there were some high‑profile warnings about synthetic ETFs as potential “black boxes” in a stress scenario. Although UCITS rules and market practice have improved protections since then, a lot of professionals prefer straightforward physical replication for core holdings, even if synthetics can offer slightly better tracking in normal markets.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.2 -
The overnight rate compounds daily. Have you factored that in?
For comparison, GONS, another synthetic ETF has delivered 1.99% over 6 months, so it is not just CSH2.
0 -
Thanks, and that last point is what actually got me wondering, as Freetrade now includes OEICs, and I was considering switching my holding to RL to eliminate the counterparty risk aspect - that's when I noticed the slight difference in return. Not enough to bother me, but still curious.
No, and good point, although my ciggie packet maths thinks the impact of compounding would only account for a smallish amount of the full spread versus SONIA
0 -
You could argue that any compounding would do no more than negate the fee, so there would still be some overperformance.
1 -
I get 1.88% for the last 6 months (22nd Jan to 23rd July) from the BoE SONIA compounded index here:
Data Series | Bank of England | Database
CSH2 is also described as "hedged". While I'd think that should mean that for a UK GBP investor, it ought to end up tracking SONIA as listed by the BoE, does that introduce another layer of complication for how the ETF is actually operated?
0 -
It formally tracks eurozone short term MM rates and hedges back to sterling. However, Invesco's equivalent fund does not and has delivered equivalent performance over the last 6 months. Whereas Xtrackers has been slightly lower at 1.82% which is net of 0.05% semiannual fees.
0 -
Well for what it's worth, I pulled the plug on CSH2 today (at least in Freetrade) and flipped over to RL. Was a bit of a faff because of their single trade limits, both buy and sell, but managed to get it done in about 10 mins.
Just for a laugh, I did ask ChatGPT (yeah, I know…) if there was a better defensive strategy to adopt if my view was that a major correction was coming in the near to mid term. Its view was a short dated gilt fund would be best because it would appreciate more in a crash due to likely lowering of interest rates, giving greater buying power for equities when I went back in.
However given it seems that interest rates are more likely to head up than down right now, I decided to ignore it!0 -
Rather disappointing that it didn't consider stagflation. It probably would have told you to pile into gold...
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.1K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
