We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Changing Mirror Wills

Just a quick question I hope! Myself and my husband have mirror wills that we made 16 years ago. We would like to change one thing which is what happens if both of us die together. We would like to leave our estate to charity rather than my husband's grandchildren.

Would this be a codicil or completely new wills?

Many thanks.

Comments

  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 48,013
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I'd suggest that completely new wills would be sensible, even though it seems to you a minor change which could conceivably be done via a codicil. But if you have a particular charity or charities in mind, you may well find that they have a scheme which enables you to do this at minimal cost to yourselves. And you get the benefit of ensuring that the way things were done 16 years ago is still appropriate, and if not it is improved.

    Signature removed for peace of mind
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 23,535
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    I would also suggest new wills after such a long time.

    I may be misreading this but why would you want different beneficiaries if you die at the same time than if you die at different times?

  • thriftytracey
    thriftytracey Posts: 755
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Homepage Hero Name Dropper
    Forumite

    They are mirror wills so if my husband dies first the estate comes to me and vice versa. But sometimes a couple can die in an accident so the will has to state what happens in those circumstances.

  • thriftytracey
    thriftytracey Posts: 755
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Homepage Hero Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 22 July at 5:25PM

    Yes, I never thought about that Savvy_Sue, thank you.

  • p00hsticks
    p00hsticks Posts: 15,150
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    edited 22 July at 8:43PM

    But it would be usual for a will to cover the scenario of who would inherit if the initial beneficiary has predeceased you, even in the scenario where the two deaths don't occur together. .

    So 'I leave everything to x, but if they have predeceased me then to y and z'

    If you simply will everything to each other with no alternative mentioned, and the surviving partner doesn't immediately write a new will following the death of their spouse (probably not usually a high priority at the time) then the second will becomes meaningless and on the second death you;d simply follow the intestacy rules (leaving the estate to any children or other close relatives.. )

  • Reed_Richards
    Reed_Richards Posts: 5,946
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I read recently that if you die together, or the order of death cannot be determined, then it is assumed that the elder died first. But it sounds as if you will need to change your wills anyway.

    Reed
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.