We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
DCB Legal/Smart Parking - Default CCJ/no claim form
I received this Judgement in Default through the post yesterday, which is relate to a PCN by Smart Parking I first received back in end of 2022.
- Letter of Claim by DCB Legal dated 31/03/2026 (received on 08/04/2026) was the last document I received prior to CCJ
- CCJ dated 30/06/2026 (received on 07/07/2026)
- Called CNBC this morning to reveal Claim Form (which I never received) issued on 04/06/2026, addressed correctly to me
- PoC emailed to me by CNBC today; potentially useful to win the case but probably not so much for the set-aside?
My utmost question is, how likely would the judge set-aside in discretion if I submit N244 on the basis of purely not received the claim form?
I have read that letters are assumed delivered unless evident provided to proof otherwise. CNBC were not able to provide any evident/receipt from mailing provider. I also read the witness statement to go with N244 is only to give reason about not receiving the Claim Form, therefore no matter how genuine my defence to the PCN is, it would not help to gain the judge's discretionary set-aside?
Consider I am within 30 days, the "debt" is about the same amount as the fee for N244 (£313), am I cooked and better just surrender to the scammer and pay the amount and be done with?
I can give further detail on the PCN if it would help the current CCJ stage. You every help is greatly appreciated.
Comments
-
You may well have to pay for a set aside based on non receipt, and try to claim it back
Or
You may get a pm from a trusted member regarding a quick resolution off the forum
You have time to wait, so see what happens over the next few days
2 -
Thanks Gr1pr for your prompt reply.
Will plan my last resort resolution now just in case I need to take that step. If I were to give in and pay Smart Parking, I heard from the lady from CNBC that I will pay Smart directly, and they will notify the court to remove the CCJ. Knowing how clumsy Smart Parking an all other parties are (it took 7 days for the CCJ to reach me, for example), should I be making my payment on Day 20 to guarantee I don't exceed the 30 days and left a record on credit history?
Or I have to notify the Court myself once I paid? Hope I don't have to end up on this route. Cheers.
0 -
You need to be more patient and not pay a penny yet. ?
I suspect that there will be a cheap and quick resolution by pm, not by me, but off here on the private grapevine
Leave the what ifs for a week or two, assuming that the default was recent ( 30th June. )
Post a redacted picture of the POC below, after redacting the VRM details first
1 -
Alright sorry I was just getting bit too worried and in rage that this happened.
Will wait and look out for PMs. Yes the judgement was dated 30/06/2026. Thanks again.
POC:
Claim No: XXXXXXXX
Claim Form Date: 4 June 2026
Claimant: SMART PARKING LIMITED
Claimant solicitor: DCB LEGAL LTD (7451)
Telephone: 0203 434 0433
Reference: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Judgment amount: £320.20
Particulars of claim:
1. THE DEFENDANT (D) IS INDEBTED TO THE CLAIMANT (C) FOR
A PARKING CHARGE (PC) ISSUEDTO VEHICLE XXXXXXX AT TOTTENHAM HALE RETAIL
PARK.
2. THE DATE OF CONTRAVENTION IS 09/10/2022 AND THE D WAS ISSUED
WITH A PC BY THE CLAIMANT
3. THE DEFENDANT IS PURSUED AS THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE FOR BREACH OF THE
TERMS ON THE SIGNS (THE CONTRACT). REASON: OVER FREE TIME.4. IN THE
ALTERNATIVE THE DEFENDANT IS PURSUED AS THE
KEEPER PURSUANT TO POFA 2012, SCHEDULE
4. AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS
1. £160.00 BEING THE TOTAL OF THE PC AND
DAMAGES.
2. INTEREST AT A RATE OF 8.00% PER ANNUM PURSUANT TO
S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 FROM THE DATE HEREOF AT A
DAILY RATE OF £0.04 UNTIL JUDGMENT OR SOONER PAYMENT.
3. COSTS AND COURT FEES2 -
Ok, here is a question for you due to it being 2022 when Smart Parking failed to comply with Pofa2012
Can you definitely and truthfully state that you were NOT the driver on that date. ?
Answer, Definitely not the driver. ! ( but only if true. )
Or
Rather not say, or , don't know etc
Do not write any other answer on here as to who was driving, we aren't asking that question at all
1 -
I definitely not the driver on that date.
2 -
Therefore you cannot be liable in law and they lied in the POC.
"
If I were to give in and pay Smart Parking, I heard from the lady from CNBC that I will pay Smart directly, and they will notify the court to remove the CCJ."She's wrong. The CNBC staff are hopeless. Obviously, when a Claimant uses a solicitor you never deal with the C direct!
"
Yes the judgement was dated 30/06/2026."OK there is time. Bear with me.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

