We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Executor Dative - Scotland "Next of kin"
I am (again) trying to find the best way to describe myself in a petition to become an executor dative (Scottish law). My relative died intestate and all beneficiaries are descendants of aunts and uncles of the deceased; he was my mother's cousin . I have been reading an old copy of "The confirmation of executors in Scotland" which is available online and if I follow this I would describe myself as "next of kin" to the deceased in the first section then explain my familial relationship to the deceased only in the Condescendence section. I like this idea but it doesn't follow any modern example that I have found. Can anyone tell me if this form of wording is still accepted?
Comments
-
What did you do with the style which was suggested to you in July last year?
0 -
Some issues arose as to the solvency/value of the estate (which eventually reached a very positive resolution) so I had been awaiting that outcome. Therefore I did nothing for the last year. But I remain concerned that the judgements are being made by some clerk who won't follow the complexity of my relationship to the deceased. When I described myself as "first cousin once removed" my petition was rejected, presumably because whoever made the judgement could find no specific reference to such a relationship in their guide or textbook. But in this instance the closest living relatives to the deceased are descendants of his aunts and uncles, first cousins, first cousins once removed and first cousins twice removed; 15 of us in total.
Anyway, I found a textbook that uses "next of kin" before then going into more detail about the familial relationship, so if this wording is still acceptable it should get me over the first hurdle.
Reed0 -
I don’t think that it will be helpful to follow the practice in a 19th century book!
I suggest you use the style I suggested - and it might help the clerk to understand if you include a family tree.
0 -
The latest edition of the book was published in 2022 but the online copy I found was from 1923 so only just over 100 years old!
Are you allowed to include supporting documents like a family tree? My impression was that you had to get the entire petition onto one page.
Reed0 -
I'd be surprised if buddy9 suggested including something you weren't supposed to.
Signature removed for peace of mind0 -
The petition is a stand alone document. A family tree could be an informal part of a cover letter.
Below is an example of a writ with made up names etc. You will want to check that I have understood the situation correctly. Item 6 of the Condescendence is an introduced addition and is not shown on the previously suggested style.
As previously mentioned, if you need a Grant of Confirmation then you will likely need to obtain a Bond of Caution at that stage.
1 -
A book published in 2022 is likely to be a reprint of the original version from 1884 because the latest edition of the book (9th edition) was published in 2011. The 4th edition was published in 1923 but I have never come across a piblically available online version of the 4th edition.
0 -
I'm sure @buddy9 is giving correct advice but my first attempt was factually correct but still rejected. So I am look whatever form of words gives the very best chance of success amongst the various correct possibilities.
You can see abbreviated petitions here https://civilonline.scotcourts.gov.uk/publishednotices#PetitionforAppointmentofExecutor but there are only four instances where "Trading name or representative capacity" is given. There is one "qua Relict", which is an archaic term for a widow, but no mention of a cousin at the present time.
FYI an online copy of "The confirmation of executors in Scotland according to the practice in the commissariot of Edinburgh" can be viewed here:
This says it was published in 1923 and it must be a later edition that the original because Edinburg in the original has become Edinburgh in this edition. Abe Books would sell me a copy of this book published in 2022
but the edition number is not stated. It's suspiciously cheap, so might be a reproduction of the original.
Reed0 -
If you think that your rejected application was factually correct, why not post a redacted version of it here for a second opinion.
You are correct about the 1923 book version. Thank you for the link.
The book published in 2022 and advertised for sale looks to be a reprint of a 19th century edition.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.7K Spending & Discounts
- 247.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.7K Life & Family
- 262.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
