We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Letting property - deciding which estate agent to use

Hi all,

I’m about to let out my first property and have narrowed things down to two local letting agents. I’d be interested to hear what factors experienced landlords would prioritise.

Both agents are offering a rent collection service at around the same monthly cost and both have valued the property at broadly similar levels.

Agent A

  • Long-established local agent.
  • Larger branch network.
  • Slightly lower setup costs.
  • Has suggested marketing at around £1,800 pcm.
  • Communication has been professional and responsive.

Agent B

  • Smaller agent with a very strong presence on the development where the flat is located.
  • Claims to have a lot of applicants specifically looking in the development.
  • Has suggested trying £2,000 pcm for a week initially and then reducing if there isn’t enough interest.
  • Slightly higher setup costs.
  • Has mentioned relationships with local employers and corporate tenants.

As a first-time landlord, I’m trying to work out whether it’s better to go with the larger established agent or the agent that seems to know the development inside out.

In your experience:

  • Is there any downside to trying a higher rent for a week or two?
  • Does an initial overpricing risk putting off potential tenants or making the property look stale?
  • Or is it sensible to test the market first and then adjust if required?

For those who have rented out flats before, would you place more value on:

  1. A larger established agency?
  2. An agent with very strong knowledge of the specific development/local market?

I have read all the terms of business and am happy with what I have negotiated with both. Any advice welcome please.

Many thanks

Comments

  • sherlock228
    sherlock228 Posts: 27 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper

    I would place more value on being allowed to talk to existing landlords of both agencies to get some real feedback

    you have not given any real factors on which to make a decision. Agent A's list is basically their own marketing flannel.
    what you want to know is whether the people that you will be dealing with are actually competent and knowledgeable.
    Just because A is has more branches does not mean it recruits better staff

  • GrumpyDil
    GrumpyDil Posts: 2,328 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Given the new rules you can't increase a rental price however many interested parties you have so an element of me says put it on at the higher price and if it doesn't get any interest in a couple of weeks reduce it slightly.

    In terms of which agent to choose for letting there my experience is that there is not normally any element of sole agency etc so nothing really to stop you from letting both list it and whoever finds a suitable tenant first gets the business.

  • Sbob53912
    Sbob53912 Posts: 3 Newbie
    Name Dropper First Post

    Thanks. I have met with the lettings managers from both agents, who visited the property and have negotiated on fees wjth me since. I’ve read through their terms and stuck them in chatgpt which threw up some additional questions to ask.


    Agent B is 12 weeks sole agent. Nothing in the other one about sole agency.

    I have not spoken to existing landlords, however I can see there are numerous flats in the area up with both agents. I can see that agent B’s tactics are always price high at first, whereas the other agent goes in with perhaps a more realistic initial price.

  • Sbob53912
    Sbob53912 Posts: 3 Newbie
    Name Dropper First Post

    Thanks for the advice!

  • sherlock228
    sherlock228 Posts: 27 Forumite
    10 Posts Name Dropper

    never lose sight of the fact the agent works for the agent's own benefit.
    You may pay them, but they do not work for you.
    This board is littered with stories of agents that know nothing or those who do not care about holding the hands of novice LL.

  • poseidon1
    poseidon1 Posts: 3,059 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    The first port of call for any novice landlord should be subscription membership to NRLA, and accessing their tuition resources -

    https://www.nrla.org.uk/

    Inserting 'letting agents' in their website search engine will throw out far more useful information than you could ever obtain from this forum.

    However, retaining the services of a half way decent letting agent is just one small aspect of a new landlord's learning curve.

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 31,821 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    • Does an initial overpricing risk putting off potential tenants or making the property look stale?

    In most areas there is high demand for good rental properties ( many threads on here about people having difficulty securing a rental property ). So even with a high price, you will probably still get interest and offers. However the quality of tenants is as important as a good price. Someone who was a bit desperate or dodgy might be more likely to accept a higher than market rate rental cost ( and then maybe not pay it).

    Have you asked the agents about their vetting procedures, and how involved in that would you be ?

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.7K Life & Family
  • 262.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.