We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Cellular aerial doesn't work

2»

Comments

  • mikb
    mikb Posts: 679
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite

    The advert actually does say "5dBi" gain. That's not 5dB boost over whatever you are using. It's 5dB compared "i" … to a standard "isotropic antenna" which isn't likely what you had in the first place. Not something average customers would necessarily know/care/understand.

    Your real advantage is from being able to mount it higher up, and outside, not inside. Of course, that advantage might not be enough to compensate for the losses you introduced with 3m of cable and two extra connectors.

    Definitely should have tested it BEFORE "accepting" the goods by fitting them in this way, it will make a return much harder, you're relying on Amazon goodwill there.

  • Rodders53
    Rodders53 Posts: 3,025
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    5dB isotropic (a theoretical antenna that cannot be made in real life as it is a infinitely small dot with spherical reception properties) is approx 3dB ref a dipole antenna (2.85dB to be precise). A dipole is a real antenna with a figure of 8 reception in one plane and an O shape in the other plane (horizontal vs vertical).

    Usually getting the receive antenna outside and higher up will get a better signal (unless the mobile pole/mast is blocked by the building) itself which may be the case here?

    How are you measuring the gain of this antenna (without extremely expensive calibrated professional kit and calibrated reference antennas for comparison?). You'll be hard pressed to prove the gain claim is wrong without that (if such proof were to be needed).

    RF is a black art. One usually tries an antenna in different locations/positions to test the signal received before fixing permanently.

    I suspect that removal of the sealant from the hole on both sides would not be impossible (messy if the mastic sealant was not fully cured, but still possible). That could then be cleaned off (white spirit, isopropyl alcohol, baby wipes, lighter fluid or similar)… So that the whole thing could be returned to Amazon and the seller.

  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 27,303
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    I may have a go at doing this. If I do it successfully, I'll report back.

    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.