We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Extending Lease - "Bulk Buying"

A close friend owns a leasehold flat in a block of six. The building is owned by a limited company which all the leaseholders are members/directors of.

Recently she was looking at (re)mortgage options and was told that she'd need at least 90 (ninety) years left on the lease but she (and all the other leaseholders) have 8X years left.

I told her that I believe that these flats would become difficult to sell/mortgage if they got below 80 (eighty) years and that it could be advantageous for all of the leases to be adjusted to 999 years and that if done as a job lot now, it might be much cheaper.

However, all the solicitors she's approached basically want to charge 6 x what they'd charge her as an individual if it was just her doing just her own flat :-(

Does anyone know of a firm or process that could get this collectively sorted for a decent discount on the one person rate? My guess is that unless she can get a £500/head deal for everyone, she'll be stuck with a bill for £2K+ just to sort her flat :-(

In my amatuer way, it seems to me that all that's needed is some sort of amendment document that says "for 125 years, read "999 years"!

(My username is not related to my real name)

Comments

  • poseidon1
    poseidon1 Posts: 3,645 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper

    Sounds to me when they originally negotiated to buy out the previous freeholder they merely established a limited company for that purpose, but left the underlying leases as they were complete with the declining term of years and in all likelihood the annual ground rents intact.

    The issue is the Freehold company is a separate legal entity from the leaseholders even though they own the company. From the company's perspective it is holding leases which in its hands has a capital value being the investment return on the ground rents, and the 'marriage value' of the declining leases.

    This is where your friend and her co shareholders in the company have a less than straightforward tax issue if they now purport to 'cancel' the leases ( and ground rents) and replace with 999 year leases at peppercorn rents.

    The company in this scenario will be making a de facto disposal of its 'investment' at nil consideration, since presumably the leaseholder/ shareholders will not be charging each other a premium to extend each other's leases. However from HMRC's viewpoint there is still a taxable disposal by the company for which they may want corporation tax on the capital gain the company has chosen to forego.

    When face with this kind of situation, and with potential tax issues to address or advise the company, most solicitors will charge for the additional responsibility of advising not just the leaseholder but also the company. If corporation tax is an issue, most property lawyers do not in any event have competency to assist and may specifically exclude tax as part of their brief to handle a lease extension in this circumstance.

    The article from Taxadviser in the link below highlights the tax problem here, with examples which will no doubt resonate with your friend and her co leaseholders. Perhaps you should share it so that she has a better idea of the issues at stake here.

    https://share.google/mXQgo0uo7sadLLknv

    As you may have gathered by now it is not a 'simple' issue of striking out 125 years on a lease and replace with 999 years.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.