We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Savings "Protection"?? changes on way
ipri
Posts: 649 Forumite
Hi...as predicted changes on way to safegaurd savings....Has anyone seen any more details of what may be in the pipeline??
0
Comments
-
I thought that it was just an increase to the maximum protected level to either £50000 or £100000. Personally I think the former is a better bet because that won't result in a fairly large drop in the interest rates we can expect from the banks.I am a Chartered Financial Planner
Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.0 -
I'm not sure whether that is actually going to happen. It is no accident that everyone in government has gone quiet on this since soon after the run on Northern Rock. Having said that, Darling's guarantee to Northern Rock depositors could be taken as an implicit guarantee that the government will act to protect deposits in the event of future bank distress.0
-
It's too late to research it, for links - but there are two elements under consideration. The first is the increase in protection of deposits from the current £35k. The second is to consider the viability of 'seizing' (for want of a better word) the cash assets of depositors in order they have orderly but timely access to them. In order to combat a repeat of the queues outside Branches and allegations of a deliberately spiked online system - which were a feature of NR.
Hopefully - all unnecessary.If you want to test the depth of the water .........don't use both feet !0 -
The last time I suggested that may happen it was poo-poo'd (sp?) by those 'in the know'. It was stated that the levy paid/required was so small it wouldn't impact on savings (or mortgage) rates offered.Personally I think the former is a better bet because that won't result in a fairly large drop in the interest rates we can expect from the banks.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards