📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Savings "Protection"?? changes on way

Hi...as predicted changes on way to safegaurd savings....Has anyone seen any more details of what may be in the pipeline??

Comments

  • Aegis
    Aegis Posts: 5,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I thought that it was just an increase to the maximum protected level to either £50000 or £100000. Personally I think the former is a better bet because that won't result in a fairly large drop in the interest rates we can expect from the banks.
    I am a Chartered Financial Planner
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
  • neilp
    neilp Posts: 210 Forumite
    I'm not sure whether that is actually going to happen. It is no accident that everyone in government has gone quiet on this since soon after the run on Northern Rock. Having said that, Darling's guarantee to Northern Rock depositors could be taken as an implicit guarantee that the government will act to protect deposits in the event of future bank distress.
  • Mikeyorks
    Mikeyorks Posts: 10,377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It's too late to research it, for links - but there are two elements under consideration. The first is the increase in protection of deposits from the current £35k. The second is to consider the viability of 'seizing' (for want of a better word) the cash assets of depositors in order they have orderly but timely access to them. In order to combat a repeat of the queues outside Branches and allegations of a deliberately spiked online system - which were a feature of NR.

    Hopefully - all unnecessary.
    If you want to test the depth of the water .........don't use both feet !
  • YorkshireBoy
    YorkshireBoy Posts: 31,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Aegis wrote: »
    Personally I think the former is a better bet because that won't result in a fairly large drop in the interest rates we can expect from the banks.
    The last time I suggested that may happen it was poo-poo'd (sp?) by those 'in the know'. It was stated that the levy paid/required was so small it wouldn't impact on savings (or mortgage) rates offered.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.