We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Recently supplied and fitted phone battery failed and swelled

In January, I paid a mobile phone repair shop to supply and fit a new battery in my phone. They did this in house. In April, I complained that the new battery started dropping like a stone once it reached about 30%, and the phone was shutting down.

The shop showed me a display of their terms and conditions that state their parts and labour have a 28 day warranty. Am I correct in thinking that this is contrary to the Consumer Rights Act? As I understand it, even consumables like batteries have to last a typical amount of time if you pay full price, as I did. And before 6 months, the onus is on the retailer to show the battery was not defective at the time of purchase.

Does the fact that the battery was also fitted complicate matters? If they reluctantly offer me a new battery free of charge, can they charge me for fitting it?

The battery has now completely died and swollen to the point where the phone is coming apart, so I neeed to resolve this at once. Does the law allow me to insist on a free fitting of a new battery, else a full refund? I paid by credit card.

Comments

  • fwor
    fwor Posts: 6,980 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    No - the 28 day warranty is completely legal, but it has no effect at all on your consumer rights - it is a completely separate thing. At this stage, their warranty is (obviously) no longer relevant, but your rights under the CRA remain.

    The only possible catch is that they could theoretically allege that the charging circuitry in the phone is over-charging the battery and damaging it. But the terms of the CRA would require that they demonstrate that this is the case - they cannot just allege it (in theory, at least).

    I've done battery replacements on phones in the past and had exactly what you describe, with the battery swelling up so much that it forces the back off. This has always been (in my experience) a failure of the battery and not the phone - solved by replacing the battery again.

  • dumpster_fire2025
    dumpster_fire2025 Posts: 227 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper

    They can't charge you for fitting it if you paid them to fit it in the first place.

    Even if they just sold you a battery, in theory if it was faulty they'd also need to reimburse you for the fitting, although enforcing that is a different matter.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.