We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Seeking advice on an escalated PCN

Hi all,

I’d really appreciate some advice on a UKPC parking charge that has now escalated to a Letter of Claim stage.

Background

  • Parking company: UK Parking Control (UKPC)
  • Location: West Point, 29 Wellington Street, Leeds
  • Date of alleged contravention: 02/11/2025
  • PCN reason: “Parked displaying a non valid permit”
  • Amount now claimed: £170

I am the registered keeper (Scottish address), and the PCN was issued by post. No windscreen ticket was left.

Key facts

  • A valid permit was clearly displayed at the time
  • UKPC have confirmed in writing that the permit was valid
  • The issue is that the permit was for bay 137, but the vehicle was parked in bay 136 (adjacent bay), as another car was in the allocated space

Signage

The sign at the location states:

  • Vehicles must be parked within marked bays
  • A valid permit must be displayed

It does not state:

  • That a permit is only valid for a specific bay
  • That parking in a different bay invalidates the permit

Correspondence issues

  • I did not receive the original Notice to Keeper, only a “Final Reminder”
  • The parking company has not provided proof of posting
  • Later debt collection letters were sent to an old address, suggesting tracing issues

Escalation so far

The case has passed through multiple companies:

  • UKPC
  • ZZPS
  • QDR Solicitors
  • DCBL
  • Now with Moorside Legal Services (Letter of Claim received)

Current position

I submitted a response to the Letter of Claim disputing the debt.
Moorside have replied with a standard evidence pack and are asserting:

  • The PCN is compliant with PoFA 2012
  • The permit was not valid for the bay
  • The £70 add-on is justified under ATA guidelines

They have asked for payment within 7 days.

My main arguments

  • A valid permit was displayed (confirmed by UKPC)
  • The signage does not require parking in a specific bay
  • Therefore, no contractual breach occurred
  • The NtK appears non-compliant with PoFA (no period of parking stated)
  • Service of documents is disputed

Questions

  1. Does my signage argument have strong merit in court?
  2. Is the PoFA “period of parking” issue likely to defeat keeper liability?
  3. Should I respond again to Moorside or now just wait for a formal Letter Before Claim / claim form?
  4. How likely is UKPC to pursue this to court given the circumstances?
  5. Any other angles I should be focusing on?

Current plan

I am planning to:

  • Maintain my dispute
  • Not identify the driver
  • Engage at formal pre-action / claim stage
  • Prepare a defence if needed

Would really appreciate any guidance or confirmation I’m on the right track, or if my best option is just to pay up…

Thanks in advance.

Comments

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 13,957 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited Today at 2:45PM

    If the RK is registered in Scotland, was the incident location in Scotland. ? Seems to have been in England. ?

    Has the vehicle always been registered in Scotland or was it previously at an England address ( ( old address. )

    Have you studied the advice for Scotland in the newbies sticky thread in announcements near the top of the forum by coupon mad. ?

  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 162,271 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    "I am the registered keeper (Scottish address)"


    So why are you engaging with Moorside Legal? They can't take you to English small claims court!

    Did you point that out to them?

    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • Can they not take me to Scottish small claims court? I haven’t thus far mentioned that to them.

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 13,957 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited Today at 8:02PM

    There is no "small claims court " in Scotland, nor can you get a CCJ in Scotland either

    Plus, at the moment POFA2012 is not on the current menu for Scotland until at least 2027

  • Car1980
    Car1980 Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    What a merry go round of solicitors! Only Gladstones is missing!

    DCB Legal know they can't deal with Scottish ones, so it's amusing to see DCBL bat it back.

    What's the collective noun for clowns?

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.