We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Agoda cancelled my confirmed paid hotel booking, refusing comparable replacement
Comments
-
Thought I'd give that a double "Interesting" and "Thanks"
[Edit - Oh - I can't do both! Oh dear. the forum can't risk people being overly congratulated - where would it end?]
0 -
If they have refunded what the OP paid then there is no chargeback.
Not that there is one that would cover a retailer canceling a booking.
S75 is out due to debtor creditor & no link.
Life in the slow lane0 -
@born_again is of course correct for this particular case.
I should have made clear that I was just summarising the general position for the benefit of others who might have a contract for sales made under Singapore law.
Singaporean law administration is very efficient and widely respected. It is the jurisdiction of choice for many sellers in south-east Asia.
2 -
Very good of you check that 🙂
I would have thought S75 still applies though as S75 just says any breach or misrepresentation, unless there is something elsewhere in the Act limiting liability?
Had it been a UK company such a problem would be damages due to breach of contract rather than a breach of the CRA so might the legal answer depend upon what Singapore's system offers for a breach?
OP whilst it's not the best, had I been you I'd probably have taken the refund + 100% (or 200% voucher had you wanted to rebook with them) are those options still on the table?
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
Singaporean civil law is heavily based on English common law. Their contract law is virtually the same as ours. Also, Singapore enforces UK judgments via common law mechanisms, the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act, and the Choice of Court Agreements Act so you might be able to get a judgement here under s75 then enforce it in Singapore.
1 -
Thanks Alderbank, so if OP rebooked their holiday at the current price they should be able to simply claim the extra from the credit card company under Section 75 as damages for the breach?
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces1 -
Wasn't @born_again suggesting s75 wouldn't apply because the debtor-creditor-supplier chain is broken?
2 -
Only way S75 would come into play is if it was the hotel paid direct & not booking co.
Life in the slow lane1 -
This seems like an obvious case of pricing error.
Nothing for the OP to pursue.
1 -
Well, I found similar prices on Booking.com and Trip.com as well.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.1K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
