We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

DCB Legal again...

124»

Comments

  • MrJenkinsEsq
    MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 313
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 18 October at 6:13PM

    Was the vehicle encroaching on the hatching to the rear, the side, or both?

    I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

  • OldBugger
    OldBugger Posts: 56
    10 Posts Name Dropper First Anniversary
    Forumite

    Both righthand wheels were on the hatched area to the right of the vehicle.

  • MrJenkinsEsq
    MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 313
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 18 October at 7:29PM

    Their reply says, "It is noted that the Defendant admits to parking on the Land" - has that been admitted to them? Sorry for the 20 questions!

    I don't know if their reply informs a likelihood of continuation, but I'm operating on the assumption that it does.

    I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

  • OldBugger
    OldBugger Posts: 56
    10 Posts Name Dropper First Anniversary
    Forumite

    Yes I admitted it in my defence summary.

    I could not dispute as their photos clearly show my vehicle parked partially on the hatchings

  • MrJenkinsEsq
    MrJenkinsEsq Posts: 313
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite

    On the chance it does go ahead, I've written a skeleton argument in the hope that it's useful. There are some things to confirm and some things that would need to be in evidence, assuming they are true. I've based the facts largely on Street View, the most recent captures are from 2018.

    https://drive.proton.me/urls/MRABJEQA7G#FUVneUaBh1F8

    I'm a random person on the internet. I hold no legal qualifications and nothing I say is advice.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.