Royal London STMMF NAV/Price?

cloud_dog

Hi…. Anyone noticed that the Royal London STMMF hasn't updated it NAV/price since 6 May?

It is not something I have noticed previously, so was curious if this is something that just happens periodically or is unusual?

poblomov

Looks uptodate on their website. Where are you seeing it not updated?

Rollinghome

The RL website is showing the price as 120.88. SWidows shows 120.875, which is probably yesterday's valuation and more accurate as the actual price is usually to 4 decimal points. HL and the FT, as of 6 May, are showing 120.80 and non up to date charts, so looks like the source both use has a problem.

Edit: RL price is of 12 May. The price to 4 places for 12 May valuation seems to be 120.8753p.

cloud_dog

The sites (HL, FT, etc) I've checked are dating the price as of 6 May.

Although just checking FT and it is now dated 12 May, so that site has updated. HL still 6 May, but may update later / overnight.

Was just curious as to why / what may cause a delay in price updates from the fund manager?

Rollinghome

It was only 2 hours ago I saw the 6/5 price on FT so maybe someone saw your post and plugged something back in.

Section62

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81997285#Comment_81997285

I've had occasional issues with Royal London fund prices not being updated on my usual sources for about 6 months. Sometimes the RLUM site goes a few days with no updates. Usually there will be one source with the current price/valuation, but it takes a bit of searching.

Rollinghome

Stuff happens. F&C did a 4 for 1 share split on Monday. Low cost SWidows platform updated accounts right away, and I see various platforms were warning clients not to worry when the share price dropped by 75%, as expected.

But it seems that no-one told Hargreaves Lansdown. Try searching for F&C or FCIT, and it returns a 404/page not found, or just ignores you. For all his faults, I doubt it would have happened, or not without heads rolling, in Peter Hargreaves day.

Albermarle

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81997442#Comment_81997442

I think even in Peter Hargreaves day, HL did not use the main info providers like Trustnet & Morningstar, and some of the info was not the best.

Rollinghome

Agreed. I thought Danny Cox, HL Head of Communications and now retired, was pushing it a bit back then when he defended their high fees by claiming that for Waitrose prices they gave a 'Waitrose' service. But it was an infinitely better platform than it is now. Most platforms have improved but HL have gone backwards.

Even Which? who always tend to prefer the reassuringly expensive and once had HL consistently at the top of their list, have now dropped them to 17th place. Times have changed.

20122013

@cloud_dog

On 14 May 2026 00.38am ii website is still showing (RL) Fund price from 06 May