We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Civil Enforcement Court Claim - N1SDT
Hi all,
I’ve received a County Court Claim Form (MCOL) relating to a private parking charge and would appreciate some advice.
Background:
- Parking event was around November 2023.
- Location was a Costco customer car park.
- The allegation appears to relate to exceeding the maximum stay period.
- Vehicle was an old car which I no longer own.
- I ignored previous letters at the time.
- I received no warning/Letter Before Claim.
What I find strange:
I heard nothing for a very long time (2+ years), then recently received TWO separate HMCTS money claims around the same time (for different parking matters), one which I already have a forum open for.
This Costco claim:
- Issue Date: 21 April 2026
- Claim form only physically arrived today (8 May 2026), which seemed very delayed.
- I have now completed the Acknowledgment of Service online and selected “defend all”.
I have not yet submitted a defence; I am currently writing out my paragraph 3 and adjusting the defence template.
I have attached the Particulars of Claim (Civil Enforcement) details shortly (with personal details redacted).
Main questions:
- Is it common for old parking charges to suddenly progress to MCOL after long periods of silence?
- Does the delayed arrival of the claim form matter at all?
- Are these types of maximum-stay retail park claims generally defendable, or usually straightforward for the claimant?
Thanks in advance.
Comments
-
Its not a Letter of Claim, that Letter comes before the Money Claim N1SDT pack, so please change your thread title to something more suitable , only the Court Claim and POC are relevant
1 extremely common, the statute is 6 years
2 no
3 defendable
1 -
Just use the Template Defence version for CEL in-house claims where the breach isn't pleaded.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
With an issue date of 21/04/26 and providing you complete(d) the AoS after 26/04/26 and before or on 10/05/26 your defence deadline date is 4.00 p.m. on 26/05/26
2 -
Thank you for the above. Btw, what do you mean by 'CEL in-house claims'?
0 -
CEL is obviously your parking firm who is currently suing you and I never explain a normal business phrase like 'in-house'. It's neither parking related nor a legal term; the meaning is self explanatory (or googleable if you've never heard it before).
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
Thank you. Taking on your advice, Am I okay to use the following default paragraph as per template, and use the rest of the template as per forum?
Do I need to add any specifics about my case to paragraph 3 of the defence? Thank you.
3. With regards to the POC in question, two recent persuasive appeal judgments in Civil Enforcement Limited v Chan (Ref. E7GM9W44) and Car Park Management Service Ltd v Akande (Ref. K0DP5J30) would indicate the POC fails to comply with Civil Procedure Rule 16.4(1)(e) and Practice Direction Part 16.7.5. On the 15th August 2023, in the Chan case, HHJ Murch held: 'the particulars of the claim as filed and served did not set out the conduct which amounted to the breach in reliance upon which the claimant would be able to bring a claim for breach of contract'. The same is true in this case and the Defendant trusts that the Court should strike out the extant claim, using its powers pursuant to CPR 3.4. The second recent persuasive appeal judgment also held that typical private parking case POC (like this) fail to comply with Part 16. On the 10 May 2024, in CPMS v Akande, HHJ Evans held: 'Particulars of Claim have to set out the basic facts upon which a party relies in order to prove his or her claim'.
0 -
Use that paragraph 3 above, no additions or removals , no extra details
In-house means they control all of the claim, no 3rd party lawyers as middlemen
3 -
Thank you, I have submitted using the above paragraph 3 and the default template provided. Thank you so much all. Will post again when I hear back. 😀
3 -
Hi All, Just an update, I have just received the Directions Questionnaire, which I am going to fill in and send out by tomorrow. I have followed the instructions on the forum, and will be emailing to DQ.CNBC@justice.gov.uk and CC Civil Enforcement legal team.
I am using the email address that is in their Directions Questionnaire copy that was sent to me, which is legal@ce-service.co.uk.
Could someone confirm this is the correct/most up to date email address for Civil Enforcement?
Thank you.1 -
These have all proven usable in the recent past.
office@ce-service.co.uk
Legal3@ce-service.co.uk
complaints@ce-service.co.uk
claimsmanager@ce-service.co.uk
dataprotectionofficer@ce-service.co.uk2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.9K Spending & Discounts
- 248K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.8K Life & Family
- 262.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



