We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

House insurance/mortgage with indemnity insurance

Hi all, my conveyancer somehow never realised that the seller’s roofing work to replace all the tiles required a completion certificate. It was only after several months that I realised this rule applied.

The conveyancer magicked an indemnity insurance policy out of thin air the day I flagged it to them. I understand this is little more than a blind bet by a company who have never seen the roof.

Do you need to tell the company you have your main house insurance with and your mortgage provider that it turns out you were meant to have a completion certificate for the roof you thought had no legal issues when you bought the place and took the policies out?

Am I likely to even be able to get a mortgage without the roof approved?

Comments

  • Bigphil1474
    Bigphil1474 Posts: 4,059 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    Are you meaning building control sign off? The indemnity policy only covers you for any legal costs associated with the roof should the local authority take any legal action. Lack of sign off doesn't mean the roof is unsafe. A lot of roofers can do the BC sign off themselves - I'd be asking the vendor to clarify rather than wasting money on an indemnity policy.

    I'm not sure (in the real world) why you would tell the insurance company unless you believe the roof isn't satisfactory. Similarly with the mortgage provider.

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,562 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    SmallClaimant123 said

    Am I likely to even be able to get a mortgage without the roof approved?

    The indemnity insurance is likely to be a requirement to keep the mortgage company happy. Without it they might not agree to offer a mortgage.

    Perhaps the more important question for you is "was the roof work done 'properly' (i.e. to meet building regulations)"? And if so, why didn't the roofer/owner get a building regs completion certificate?

    Maybe you want to get a building surveyor or structural engineer to inspect the roof.

    (And you wouldn't have to declare this to your insurers, as it doesn't really affect the risks they cover - unless the insurance company specifically ask you, which would be very unusual.)

  • Roofers aren’t legally obliged to tell their customers apparently so he probably don’t know (especially since my conveyancer thought like it sounded a small task and so didn’t ask about it - Ombudsman already ruled in my favour on that).

    I’ve had a roofer take a look when he was improving ventilation and thought it was ok. I’ll probably get it to a point where it meets building regs and get retrospective approval).

    It’s just what I do in the meantime (I’m now about a year into living here and I only just realised indemnity might affect my mortgage - again zero advice from the conveyancer when they grudgingly handed over a policy)

  • I was thinking it might something the insurer takes a dim view on and thinks I’ve been trying to mislead them when I took out my policy

  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 19,550 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    You'd only have "misled" them if you gave a false answer to one of their questions on the proposal form, you don't need to volunteer information which you think might be relevant but they haven't asked about.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.