We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Conveyancing and water pipes

I'm in the process of selling my parent's house which has been in their possession for over 50 years.


All searches have been done and the buyers solicitor has come back with this: “We cannot see the title refers to any rights for the benefit of the Property to connect to, use and access the mains water pipe in the adjacent field. Our client’s lender’s requirements are that they will not accept indemnity insurance in place of formal rights". They want us to get a deed of easement instead.


According to the water plan, the mains pipe is not under the public highway but runs parallel to it and on the other side of the road to our house, through what is private land (the field).


However from everything I've read on line, the section of water pipe that we have no rights over is the communication pipe because it is on the other side of our external stop tap (which is on the boundary of our property). Out local water company and ofwat both state that communication pipes are the responsibility of the water company. So why do we need rights to use it?


The water plan only shows the mains pipe, it does not show the communication pipe or the stop tap. Is this the problem? If so how easy is it to get the water company to amend the error on their map?


Any advice gratefully received!

Comments

  • martindow
    martindow Posts: 10,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Have you spoken to the water company regarding your house as opposed to general principles? If they agree that they are responsible for your water supply up to the stop tap on your land I think that would solve the problem.

    Your buyers are nervous regarding problems with access in case of leaks etc. A written response from the water company showing that they own this section of pipe should satisfy them. Utilities have extensive powers to access private land to make repairs if that were ever necessary.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.