We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Selling part of flat to my mum without conveyancer.

longdistancemum
longdistancemum Posts: 13 Forumite
Part of the Furniture Name Dropper First Post

My husband bought a flat for my mum so she could move nearer us before she sold her own flat which was difficult to sell. My mum has been living in the flat near us for a year and now she has sold her flat she is keen to buy 50% from my husband which has been the plan from the start. In hindsight we should have asked the conveyancer to put the new flat in joint names of my husband and mum at the start. Now we are being quoted £1400 fees for my husband to sell 50% and £1000 for my mum to buy 50%. There is no mortgage and no need to redo all the searches, so I'm researching doing the paperwork for land registry ourselves. It is leasehold but I have email from freeholder Taylor Wimpey that because it's a maisonette they do no management and charge no service fee, we just spilt any costs with the flat upstairs and this is in the deeds. Looks like we'll need to pay a professional to complete the ID checks that land registry require. I know about capital gains tax. What I can't figure out is, can my mum just transfer the money into my husband’s account? It would be £80k and she would then have £20k left in savings and no other property.

«1

Comments

  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,880 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper

    You can research ‘transfer of equity’.

    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Mgman1965
    Mgman1965 Posts: 292 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    Deprivation of assets springs to mind, as it will the LA'S if your mum needs care.

    Transfering large amounts of cash or giving assets away (or for pennies) never goes unnoticed

    People still ask if mum/dad can sell them their 300k house for a £1 (and even still live in it) to avoid having to sell it for care home fees.

  • FreeBear
    FreeBear Posts: 18,416 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    If the mother is buying 50% at (or close to) market rate, there is no deprivation of assets.

    Paying a total of £2400 for a simple transfer of equity is taking the pee in my opinion. Doing the paperwork yourselves and getting a solicitor to check the documents would be cheaper if you can find one willing to do the work.

    Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
    Erik Aronesty, 2014

    Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.
  • GrubbyGirl_2
    GrubbyGirl_2 Posts: 1,195 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    How is it deprivation of asests when she is selling 1 property and buying another? As long as she's not buying 50% of the property at 100% of the market price it's all completely legit

  • longdistancemum
    longdistancemum Posts: 13 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Name Dropper First Post

    It wouldn't be deprivation of assesses if she's buying somewhere she'd be living, surely. She'dstill have an asset.

  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 31,422 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper

    Correct, and if she had to go into a care home, the local authority would take into account she owned half the maisonette.

  • mills112
    mills112 Posts: 411 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper

    when i did an equity transfer i found that you need to have solicitors involved because they need to do AML checks on the money and to ascertain the stamp duty payable. without their vetting / putting their name down to it, you can get into trouble with HMRC and the land registry.

    so i think you can't avoid it and i found that you need two solicitors as well as one can not do the transaction for both party.

  • mills112
    mills112 Posts: 411 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper

    £2,400 is the fee for them pretty much checking the forms as there isn't really much to complete!

    it is their fee for putting their name to it but they have to carry out ID checks and AML checks as part of the service. i had a ridiculous amount of AML done for savings the money i used to buy the equity in a house that I already own half of! not only did I need to prove where the savings came from, i had to prove where i got all my other money from as well, which has nothing to do with the equity transfer!

  • sheenas
    sheenas Posts: 354 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    working with the land registry is a pain and if all the proof and documentation does not line up they will reject the transaction.

    I guess the question is why does she want to own a 50% share other than security. It’s about inheritance planning and may be there are better options?

  • mills112
    mills112 Posts: 411 Forumite
    100 Posts Name Dropper

    my solicitor had terrible trouble with the stamp duty form for the transfer notice for the land registry as i was buying the equity from my ex so stamp duty gets a bit complicated. they said without this form done correctly, it is not possible to register the purchase with the land registry. so without the solicitors involved, the land registry may not accept the transfer as there has been no independent AML checks or stamp duty liability assessment by a professional solicitor.

    the land registry will want to satisfy themselves that all these legal aspects have been dealt with before they will accept the transfer.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.