We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Salary Sacrifice Car Scheme - Who is responsible if car proves to be defective?
At the end of last summer I received a new Volvo EX90 through my employer's salary sacrifice scheme (facilitated by Tusker's). Since receiving the Volvo it has spent more time being repaired than in my possession - at present it has been with the dealership since the end of January with repairs outstanding owing to lack of parts in the UK. This most recent issue raised a safety defect as an airbag malfunctioned. I have lost patience with Volvo Customer care who maintain I am unable to pursue a complaint as Tusker's are the contractual partner & formal holder of the car; in turn Tusker's maintain this is a maintenance issue they are addressing & cannot intervene even though these repairs have exceeded 8+ weeks…I have raised this formally with my employers now but would welcome hearing from anyone else who has had a similar experience. In my mind the car isn't fit for purpose if its had significant issues that have prevented me from driving it. I don't understand how companies like Tusker's & Volvo can do what they do & force a deadlock situation where I am without the car that I pay through the salary deductions & they dispute liability.
Comments
-
This question has arisen before and the OP may wish to read the following thread:
Volvo are correct that there is no direct link to the OP as the customer for Volvo is the lease company. Does the OP's employer have a fleet manager to can take matters up on their behalf?
1 -
I also have a car with Tusker through salary sacrifice. Luckily I've not had any issues but I did raise this question with them and my employer before taking it on. I was advised any issues that couldnt be resolved would need to be raised with my employer, as my contract is with them and they then hold the contract with Tusker.
0 -
The contract is between your employers and Tuskers, almost certainly. It is therefore up to your employer to decide if they want to take any action but as a B2B contract it will all come down to the contractual terms rather than consumer rights.
Ultimately all company cars are paid for out of your salary as even a traditional one you'd typically be on more money if the car wasnt part of the package and hence why BIK comes into play for both traditional and salary sacrifice.
0 -
What does your employer's Car Policy say about maintenance/fault issues? That's ultimately what matters.
Jenni x0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
