We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Section 75 claim for working system but poor workmanship
I had a towbar fitted to my campervan. It developed a fault, but my main problem is the quality of the wiring install. It's a Fiat Ducato van so the battery is under the passenger footwell and it's access panel is walked on whenever you have a passenger. The installer had laid the towbar control box on top of the battery, so that you crush it every time you walk over the panel - and the panel itself no longer fits properly. It can't be moved easily as the wires are too short.
It went back today to get the fault fixed and to get them to tidy up the install. When it came back they dropped it off and left. The fault seems to have gone but when I checked the battery box all they've done is wedge the control box next to the battery and changed nothing else. The lid still doesn't close properly. It needs all the cables extending and the control box relocating (as per the manufacturer's instructions) - so they've bodged it.
I don't really want to give it back to the installers as they are now a long way away and a pain to deal with - they've had a chance to fix it and only partially succeeded.
The installation was paid for on a Credit Card - so my question is: If I make a section 75 claim for the poor workmanship is it likely I will be successful, or will I have to give them another chance to make it good? Are they likely to contest the claim and if so, how would I handle that?
Comments
-
Services are repeat performance > price reduction.
They’ve had a repeat performance so you are entitled to the price reduction, that should be the difference between what was paid and what was given, cost of redoing it correctly would seem about right.Burden of proof is upon yourself so cc might ask for an expert opinion on the matter, if they do and that opinion agrees with you cc should cover the cost of obtaining that opinion.
The breach to argue would be (a lack of) due care and skill, which is an implied term.
If cc try to fob you off raise an official complaint.
Above assumes the install cost was over £100.
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
Best bet speak to bank & ask exactly what they would require to look at your case.
Poor workmanship is very subjective.
Life in the slow lane0 -
Poor workmanship is very subjective.
.. unless it is clearly done against the manufacturer's installation guide (as is suggested by the OP). 🤷♀️
Jenni x0 -
So OP would need to prove the error.
Life in the slow lane1 -
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

