We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Premium bonds win

2456

Comments

  • BikingBud
    BikingBud Posts: 2,804 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    And how did you explain this and assure yourself that he fully understood that you were depriving him?

    Your life is too short to be unhappy 5 days a week in exchange for 2 days of freedom!
  • Haddenham35
    Haddenham35 Posts: 65 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    I understand the legal points made, but I'm very clear on the moral and emotional challenge of giving our sons an equal footing in life.

    The actual financial questions I raised still remain - what are the best vehicles available to house the money whilst we wait for JISA allowances to reset each year?

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,201 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Why are you considering using cash savings for a five‑month‑old baby?

    Were the Premium Bonds held in your name but mentally earmarked for the children, or were they specifically in the child’s name?

    I believe what the earlier posts are indicating is that, if the bonds are in the child’s name, you would effectively be taking their money to pass it on to others. The money belongs to the child if it was held in their name.

    The definition of a ‘decent sum’ is probably a key issue. ‘Decent’ could mean £100 to one person or £100,000 to another. The consequences of sharing the former are minimal, whereas the implications of sharing the latter are more significant

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Haddenham35
    Haddenham35 Posts: 65 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    ok new scenario to avoid any 'depriving' of my child.


    let's say, scenario a is that (as guardian of the money) I leave it where it is in premium bonds. No interest and little chance of winning a significant sum again. Hand over this amount to child A when he's 16.


    scenario b - split the money, withdraw and invest in a sensible tracker. Accumulate and compound so that by the time child a reaches 16 we've created the same value of pot as he has now, but with now a secondary pot for child B.


    Child A gets the same outcome, but child B benefits too.

  • Section62
    Section62 Posts: 10,947 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper

    You'd still be depriving child A of the pot you are allocating to child B.

    This isn't a moral issue - what the previous posts have been pointing out is that you have a legal obligation to manage child A's money for their benefit, and their benefit alone. Arguably there is also a tax issue as well - if you artificially split child A's money to gain an advantage from child B's tax benefits then you may find yourself on thin ice with HMRC.

  • Woodstok2000
    Woodstok2000 Posts: 1,069 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 11 March at 1:00AM

    Scenario B deprived Child A of Scenario C:

    Withdraw and invest in a sensible tracker. Accumulate and compound so that by the time child a reaches 16 we've created double the value of pot as he has now.

    Of course, there's Scenario D. Manage the money in the best interests of child A until they are 16, at which point you explain the situation and hopefully they agree to split the money with their sibling. If not, you could always rebalance any other financial support accordingly to even things out.

    And to return to the original question, as the money belongs to Child A, unless they are earning £18k plus in interest there's likely no tax liability even outside an ISA. If you decide to gift money to child b, as i understand it anything over £100 in interest will be taxed as if it was your money, unless its in an ISA.

  • Emmia
    Emmia Posts: 7,115 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 11 March at 7:19AM

    Can we presume that the amount won is more than the maximum PB holding? If it is, I'd put the excess in a cash savings account and then move the money over to an ISA in Son A's name each year

    If not, just leave it in the PBs and take out the amount you wish to invest in an ISA in Son A's name each year.

    You never know, they may win again...

    *If your sons were adults would you expect them to share winnings with each other on a 50/50 basis? Would you expect this if they were teenagers? Would you be upset if they didn't share?

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.