All Parking Services UK Ltd

Coupon-mad

Then you have no choice but to simply tick 'no' (which means 'no I'm not answering').

They have no right to make appeal appear (or to be) conditional on saying if the appellant keeper/hirer was driving or not. That was officially banned by David Dunford at the DVLA over a decade ago.

Here's the same ZZPS webpage used by victims of Azure Parking:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81763594#Comment_81763594

Like I said on that thread, The DVLA and BPA issued a communication years ago that operators CANNOT make appeals appear reliant upon the keeper having to say if they were driving or not.

It's typical ZZPS scam conduct (just look at their Trustpilot reviews!) to send a keeper a notice saying they're liable under the POFA, yet refusing their right to appeal.

A keeper is perfectly entitled to appeal.

Here's the BPA and DVLA's stated position on this (thanks to Siross for this useful DVLA email). It is not allowed to appeal to make appeal conditional upon saying who was driving:

From the DVLA in 2014:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/64401866#Comment_64401866

The new statutory Code & framework MUST stop operators and scum time-waster greedy cling-on DRAs from doing this to keeper appellants.

They've also added a £1.95 'handling fee' which is clearly an unnecessary abuse because PCNs are set too high already and are all about wanting payment!

The MHCLG's wider regulatory framework must ban that completely to nip potential 'cap' workarounds in the bud.