We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Travel Insurance Advice

2»

Comments

  • saint101
    saint101 Posts: 3 Newbie
    First Post Name Dropper

    exactly this, I expect to pay abit more however not 300%.

    Part of me feels greatful that we are at least covered for the hospital bill which was substansial however some of the expenditure eg daily allowance/ additional flights & hotel for all of us were influenced by AXA and made our decision easier which is why we all stayed as advised everything was covered. If they had said black and white this isnt covered I probably would have made different decisions eg come home earlier with my eldest and picked a cheaper hotel etc not the "like for like" we were advised to.

  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 24,670 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper

    No idea who is right or who is wrong but that’s sounds like a final reply from the underwriters, therefore you could take your case to the Financial Ombudsman.

  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 37,608 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    Rather than asking them to revisit the recorded calls, you might be better off getting a transcript under a subject access request or whatever they’re called now.
    Prior to taking this to the ombudsman.

    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • MyRealNameToo
    MyRealNameToo Posts: 4,133 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    You still havent said how you managed to get a quote online? Almost all will immediately decline to quote if you say you have an undiagnosed condition.

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 20,880 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    FWIW, the OP is lucky that the insurer covered anything.

    The OP knowingly (or forgetfully) took a gamble on taking out a policy omitting the child's preventative interim treatment and ongoing investigations into an unknown condition.

    The child got ill, for a matter that seems to be in the same body system as the undeclared state.

    The insurer could very well have simply said "sorry - not covered - goodbye".

    When the contact centre with which the OP was speaking indicated that the extended stay costs would be covered, did the individuals making those comments have the information from the OP that they had travelled with the undeclared interim treatment and ongoing investigations?

    I do find it quite hard that a parent of a 4yo with an undiagnosed condition and ongoing consultant / paediatrician appointments would forget when taking out travel insurance. To make a decision to not declare on the basis "it's only a couple of weeks, what can really go wrong?" might happen but to forget that a child is potentially seriously ill seems odd.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.