We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Claiming with third party insurer

I recently got rear-ended by another car when stationary. Thankfully no-one was injured in either car. It was reported to the police who helped us get the cars out of the road. My car only has cosmetic damage but the other car is probably a write-off.

After calling my insurers to start the claim process, the other driver's insurer (Aviva) called to offer to take over the claim. They'll pay for the repair costs, a hire car and will give me a £500 goodwill payment as they'll save costs in the process.

Are there any downsides to going down this route? My insurance has already said they'll cover the excess as the other driver was at fault and I have a protected no claims bonus.

Comments

  • 35har1old
    35har1old Posts: 2,215 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper

    Hopefully the £500 will cover any possible rise in premiums

  • eschaton
    eschaton Posts: 2,247 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    I’ve had two non fault claims over the past 10 years, the last being in July.

    Dealt with 3rd party both times and would do it again.

    First time was Direct Line although I was also insured with them and last time was Saga.

  • luci
    luci Posts: 6,248 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic

    The OH had a non-fault accident many years ago around 4pm. I reported it with the hour, then the 3rd party's insurer called by 6pm and said they would take over the claim. From what I remember, we had no issues.

  • MyRealNameToo
    MyRealNameToo Posts: 3,888 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Depends on who you ask :)

    The one real downside is that you are not their customer so cannot escalate any complaint about them to the Ombudsman. Your escalation route would be court.

    The rest depends on your background… to me there is little downside, as they say they want to keep you out of the hands of credit hire etc hence their proactivity. Some will claim they'll try and minimise your claim by giving you a tiny hire car, not tell you that you can claim X, Y or Z whereas Credit Hire would give you a like for like car without question.

    Having done third party claims, I personally would say that yes, credit hire start at like for like whereas we would have a conversation of what your needs are. If you need like for like then well give that, if a more modest car is suitable for your needs we'd start there. I'd also say that accident management firms won't mention X, Y or Z either (if there are no injuries) because they dont get anything for attempting to recover uninsured losses. If you know to ask for yourself you're more likely to have a better experience with a direct claim on them.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.