We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Finding insurance details of car trader

2»

Comments

  • Mildly_Miffed
    Mildly_Miffed Posts: 2,344 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper

    Trade plates provide temporary plates for cars that are unregistered and/or untaxed-and-tested.

    The car must be roadworthy.
    The trader must have insurance.

    So the actual plate on the car is irrelevant. The trade plate is the one that matters.

  • facade
    facade Posts: 8,053 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 30 January at 10:28AM

    The trader's insurance must cover the car that the trade plates are on, so the registration of the car is relevant (and the purpose for which it was being driven).

    Unless the trader has "any unspecified vehicle bearing trade plate XXXXX" cover (a recovery business would have something like this), motor traders have to add vehicles that they acquire to their policy for them to be covered. (As seen on "Police! Shock Horror Deathchase!" programmes when they stop 17 year olds driving Golf GTIs on their friend's trader policy but the car is not actually covered by it)

    (Which is 100% of what I know about trader insurance..)

    I don't know if Article 75 would apply if the car should be added and wasn't. (I presume not)

    I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....

    (except air quality and Medical Science ;))
  • sultan123
    sultan123 Posts: 451 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Car insurance company say there is excess to pay for damages and it will be recovered from 3rd party.

    If my policy has motor legal expenses cover noted on the policy does this mean excess has to be paid?

    I worry if car insurance company do not sort this out and they come back later saying they could not recover money from traders insurance?

  • MyRealNameToo
    MyRealNameToo Posts: 3,924 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Yes, excess has to be paid unless the insurer is willing to waive it but thats purely at their discretion.

    Having LE cover means they should appoint someone to assist you in recovering your uninsured losses of which your excess is a prime example but would also include compensation for injury, hire car/loss of use if such isnt covered by your policy, loss of earnings, and any other out of pocket expenses.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.