We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Custody of will/Trust

Several years ago I made my will. The solicitors gave me a copy and retained the original. If I, or my heirs in the case of my death, ask for the original are they likely to charge for looking after it? I realise they will probably try to persuade my heirs to use them for probate but that’s a different issue.

The will itself does not just leave my assets to my heirs in a straightforward fashion but leaves everything in a trust. Is this more complicated than necessary, does it create any potential problems? My heirs are my children who share equally. My assets consist of my main residence and some bank accounts; almost certainly under the IHT level.

Comments

  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 22,654 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 28 January at 10:06AM

    If your solicitor is not charging you storage fees then they should not be any when recovering the will either.

    What sort of trust are we talking about? Leaving your estate in trust rather than leaving it to your adult children is rarely a good idea for most people unless it it to provide security for a surviving spouse, so what are you trying to achieve by it?

  • Flugelhorn
    Flugelhorn Posts: 7,612 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    Is it just that it says "executor shall hold on trust"? because I think that is just the way the exec holds money until they distribute it to the beneficiaries

    (but then it might be something else)

  • bouicca21
    bouicca21 Posts: 6,766 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    Thank you. Yes it refers to the executors (who are also the heirs) as trustees, so I suppose it is about holding on trust and I am simply overthinking it.

  • poseidon1
    poseidon1 Posts: 2,680 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    If your will directs your executors to " …… hold the residue of my estate on trust for my children in equal shares absolutely " there is no trust.

    Any wording more complex than that could denote a trust settlement, which would be of questionable utility value for your children.

    Unless one or other of them suffers a disability preventing them from managing their own financial affairs, or you have concerns about their marital partners and a future divorce might see some of your bequeathed wealth disappear out of the family, a formal trust for your children would likely be more of an expensive hindrance rather than helpful.

    Might be wise to make sure a formal trust was not established in your will and if it has, what was the reasoning behind doing so.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.