We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
[PCN Cancelled] PCM - High Point Village/Hayes and Harlington Train Station PCN
Sharing this to help others. My PCN was eventually cancelled, but only after escalation.
1. Initial appeal to parking company (as keeper)
-
Appealed as registered keeper only (did NOT name driver).
-
Focused on legal / procedural points, not mitigation.
-
Raised:
-
Non-PoFA compliance (no clear parking period, defective wording etc)
-
Signage issues (availability ≠ legibility) and signage at height - unable to read whilst driving and under wet conditions
-
Breach was trivial - no obstruction or loss.
PCN did not clearly offer an appeal – front of notice framed it as pay or name driver, appeal info buried in small print on back.
-
Appeal rejected (expected).
2. Contacted landowner / managing agent (Ballymore HQ)
-
Contacted Ballymore via HQ email (Google/ChatGPT helps find correct addresses).
-
Case was picked up by a senior property manager.
-
Initially dismissed and sided with parking company.
During this exchange, Ballymore provided additional photos that were not included in the parking company’s evidence portal when the PCN was issued.
I used this to challenge process transparency / selective evidence disclosure. I tthen proceeded to posting a letter to Ballymore HQ as well.
3. Started IAS appeal (despite low success rate)
-
Proceeded to IAS to create a formal paper trail.
-
Focused on:
-
Signage legibility vs availability (can’t read dense terms while driving).
-
No opportunity to stop/read terms (stopping prohibited).
-
No grace period to leave.
-
Unfair contract formation.
-
Procedural defects.
-
IAS appeal was ongoing when next step happened.
4. Contacted my MP (parallel escalation)
-
Explained:
-
Keeper, not driver.
-
Predatory enforcement concerns.
-
No obstruction to traffic or other vehicles.
-
Operative present but no warning.
-
Pattern of enforcement at this site (including residents).
-
Ballymore + parking company told MP they still believed a breach occurred.
5. Outcome
Head of Operations reached out to MP case handler and I - stated they still considered there was a technical breach, BUT after discussion, PCN cancelled as a “gesture of goodwill.”
Comments
-
Very tenacious. Well done!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.9K Spending & Discounts
- 246.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
