We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Trees and home insurance

I have three overgrown trees on land next to my house (two leylandii 14m and a Sycamore 11m). I have had an Arboricultural survey completed which advised removal of all three, it also states there will be no chance of heave. The land owners have given permission for removal as long as we pay. Does anyone know if I need to inform my house insurance before removal just in case heave does occur in the future? Thanks for your time.

Comments

  • Robin9
    Robin9 Posts: 13,091 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You may well need Planning Permission
    Never pay on an estimated bill. Always read and understand your bill
  • Stegor
    Stegor Posts: 37 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts
    Why would I need planning permission to remove trees? 
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 14,195 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You need to ensure they aren't protected in any way.  If they aren't they can be removed, if they are you will need permission to remove them.
  • Stegor
    Stegor Posts: 37 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts
    There is no TPO. The leaseholders of the land are supposed to maintain the trees as part of their lease which they have ignored and the freeholder isn't interested. The survey said there will be a risk of direct damage from the Sycamore in the future and the leylandii should be removed as they will just continue growing and don't belong in the urban environment. I just need to know if I need to inform my house insurance as I have informed them that I have trees over 10m within 5 m of the house and once they are removed I won't have, is this a material change they need to be informed of? Thanks.
  • gwynlas
    gwynlas Posts: 2,540 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    For your own piece of mind you can inform insurer that thte trees previously mentionned have now been removed.

    They are not on your land so your insurance will be unaffected
  • MyRealNameToo
    MyRealNameToo Posts: 4,219 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Some insurers ask if you have trees over Xm tall within Ym of your buildings. If yours are one of these then you should inform them once they are removed. If not then there is no need to inform them unless you have a high net worth style policy where a survey was done before cover issued and therefore the trees may have been noted despite you not having been asked.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.