We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

NCP - Parked causing obstruction

Hi.

I have received a 'parking charge to keeper' in the post from NCP for 'parked causing an obstruction.

Having read similar posts and the newbies thread I am little confused as to weather I appeal using the one size fits all or appeal saying it's a non-POFA Notice to Keeper, and I won't name the driver.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6608182/pcn-from-ncp-greater-anglia-for-not-parking-correctly?utm_source=community-search&utm_medium=organic-search&utm_term=parked+causing+obstruction+ncp

The above thread specifically mentions railway byelaws and the below airport bylaws.
Mine is not in a railway or airport car park.

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6523983/ncp-pcntok-parking-on-pedestrian-walkway-or-causing-an-obstruction-to-traffic-flow?utm_source=community-search&utm_medium=organic-search&utm_term=parked+causing+obstruction+ncp

I have also tried looking for @nopcns but they are showing as banned.


«134

Comments

  • mo_1
    mo_1 Posts: 116 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 December 2025 at 2:15AM
    Having done some further reading, i have found coupons POFA thread. It looks like it is the correct POFA wording. I hope i am wrong.


  • mo_1
    mo_1 Posts: 116 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    What have i missed?
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 44,331 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 24 December 2025 at 1:15PM
    Compare this warning from PoFA Schedule 4 para 9(f) and what the NCP ‘Please be warned …. ‘ para of their NtK says!

    f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given—

    (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and

    (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver,

    the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid


    No keeper liability! 😊

    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    #Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • mo_1
    mo_1 Posts: 116 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 26 December 2025 at 2:06AM
    Umkomaas said:
    Compare this warning from PoFA Schedule 4 para 9(f) and what the NCP ‘Please be warned …. ‘ para of their NtK says!

    f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given—

    (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and

    (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver,

    the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid


    No keeper liability! 😊

    Perfect thank you. Going back to my opening post. The threads i have found specifically mention airport and railway byelaws, this situation is not at an airport or railway station.
  • Were you even parked in a marked bay?
  • Were you even parked in a marked bay?
    Completely irrelevant in this case 
  • mo_1
    mo_1 Posts: 116 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper

    I will be sending the below, posting here to check please and as reference for anyone that may require in the future.


    Your NtK is a non-POFA Notice to Keeper as it does not comply with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 para 9(f)(ii), as the registered keeper of the vehicle, The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NTK can only hold the driver liable.

    I have no liability for the charge. I will not be providing you with any information on the driver, so you have no need to be asking. NCP have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.