We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Driving abroad in an ev after new tax is introduced

2»

Comments

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 20,860 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Grumpy_chap said:
    I, for one, don't want to pay a ppm charge that doesn't even fund the charge being collected.
    Other than NI unfortunately thats how all taxes and duties work these days. There is no connection between how governmental revenue is generated and how it is spent. 
    You misunderstood my comment.

    The full piece I had said:

    There is a trade off between a simple system that is cheap to operate or a more complex model that requires capital infrastructure or tracking (which may mean privacy concerns are raised).

    I, for one, don't want to pay a ppm charge that doesn't even fund the charge being collected.
    So, what I meant was, that the simple 3 pence per mile regardless of where you drive or when you drive is simple and comparatively easy and cheap to collect.
    Rather than a system that needs capital expenditure to roll out technology of some kind so that where and when you drive is correct and driving abroad can be deducted from the paid for miles.
    So, at 3 ppm, we would be several years before the tax even covered the cost of the initial capital outlay.
    That is what I mean by not pay a charge that doesn't even fund the charge being collected - a complex system would not actually pay for itself.

    Not that the 3 ppm charge would not be ring fenced.
    Although, in this clip, the Chancellor appears to link the ppm charge to road funding:
    'Everybody uses the roads and so it is right that we ask people with electric cars to pay in'
    https://www.facebook.com/bbcbreakfast/videos/everybody-uses-the-roads-and-so-it-is-right-that-we-ask-people-with-electric-car/1399920888149282/


  • facade
    facade Posts: 8,091 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 4 December 2025 at 9:45AM

    <snip>


    Probably a "Think of the Children" statement- you become a pariah if you challenge it because "they" will make out that you are actually saying that EVs that use and wear out the roads shouldn't pay towards their upkeep.

    (We will quietly forget about VED...)


    And it isn't a falsehood, a minute % of the revenue raised will go towards repairing the roads!


    I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....

    (except air quality and Medical Science ;))
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.