We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Frozen tax thresholds – should I over-withdraw from my pension at 40% now to fill our ISAs?

With the freezing of tax thresholds and potential that this will continue beyond 2028 I expect that at some point in the future that in order to meet my target income in retirement I will need to withdraw from my pension at a level that will incur the higher rate of tax at 40%.  Previously I had always assumed I would be able to get money out of my pension without ever drifting into the 40% rate.

Assuming that will happen but I have unfunded ISA each year in retirement for me and my Wife, then is there an argument to say I should withdraw more than I need each year as long as that withdrawal (taxed at 40%) is to be invested in our ISAs?  That would give me freedom to access more tax free cash if needed for emergencies and logically would make sense if on average I only expect my marginal tax rate to increase over time.  The alternative would be to just withdraw from my pension what I need, when I need it.

I am wondering if anyone is in a similar position and put some thought to this that they could share.


«1

Comments

  • Time2Go_25
    Time2Go_25 Posts: 1,005 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    and if in 4 years time there is a new government and they increase the tax thresholds, you will have paid 40% unnecessarily.
  • DRS1
    DRS1 Posts: 2,035 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Well I can imagine a scenario where it might make sense - eg if you knew that the 40% band was going to be taxed at 45% in the future.  But that would be acting on speculation (not recommended).  And doing it now exchanges the possibility of 40% tax for the certainty of 40% tax.  So I wouldn't do it if I were you.


  • greatkingrat
    greatkingrat Posts: 353 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Photogenic
    DRS1 said:
    Well I can imagine a scenario where it might make sense - eg if you knew that the 40% band was going to be taxed at 45% in the future.  But that would be acting on speculation (not recommended).  And doing it now exchanges the possibility of 40% tax for the certainty of 40% tax.  So I wouldn't do it if I were you.


    Although on the other hand there is the potential growth to consider.

    Take £10k now, pay £4k tax, stick rest in ISA, all growth tax-free
    or leave in pension, it grows to say £12k, then you pay £4.8k tax to get it out.
  • DRS1
    DRS1 Posts: 2,035 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    DRS1 said:
    Well I can imagine a scenario where it might make sense - eg if you knew that the 40% band was going to be taxed at 45% in the future.  But that would be acting on speculation (not recommended).  And doing it now exchanges the possibility of 40% tax for the certainty of 40% tax.  So I wouldn't do it if I were you.


    Although on the other hand there is the potential growth to consider.

    Take £10k now, pay £4k tax, stick rest in ISA, all growth tax-free
    or leave in pension, it grows to say £12k, then you pay £4.8k tax to get it out.
    Or maybe £2.4k tax or maybe a melded rate if you cross the threshold.  The point is you don't know now what the tax will be by the time you actually draw it out.
  • Martico
    Martico Posts: 1,214 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    DRS1 said:
    Well I can imagine a scenario where it might make sense - eg if you knew that the 40% band was going to be taxed at 45% in the future.  But that would be acting on speculation (not recommended).  And doing it now exchanges the possibility of 40% tax for the certainty of 40% tax.  So I wouldn't do it if I were you.


    Although on the other hand there is the potential growth to consider.

    Take £10k now, pay £4k tax, stick rest in ISA, all growth tax-free
    or leave in pension, it grows to say £12k, then you pay £4.8k tax to get it out.
    In both scenarios you end up keeping 7.2K, so no difference to you personally
  • leosayer
    leosayer Posts: 756 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Aside from making guesses about future income tax rates, I can't see this making sense unless your non-pensions savings are too small to allow for the kind of emergencies that would require you to draw more than £100k of income per year and be impacted by the personal allowance taper.

    Once you have used the basic rate tax bracket, you can currently draw £49,730 gross from a pension at 40% the higher rate before the taper kicks in. This will leave you with £29,838 net which is quite a lot of money for emergencies.
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 22,005 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper

    With the freezing of tax thresholds and potential that this will continue beyond 2028 I expect that at some point in the future that in order to meet my target income in retirement I will need to withdraw from my pension at a level that will incur the higher rate of tax at 40%.  Previously I had always assumed I would be able to get money out of my pension without ever drifting into the 40% rate.

    Assuming that will happen but I have unfunded ISA each year in retirement for me and my Wife, then is there an argument to say I should withdraw more than I need each year as long as that withdrawal (taxed at 40%) is to be invested in our ISAs?  That would give me freedom to access more tax free cash if needed for emergencies and logically would make sense if on average I only expect my marginal tax rate to increase over time.  The alternative would be to just withdraw from my pension what I need, when I need it.

    I am wondering if anyone is in a similar position and put some thought to this that they could share.


    To throw a spanner in the works. If you started the process now, & Annual ISA levels were reduced. Where would that leave you.

    So many leaks & a good comment today. That chancellors have been forced to resign over single leaks in the past. Yet this year we seems to have more than Thames Water do.
    It's like a consultation process this year 🤣
    Life in the slow lane
  • fizio
    fizio Posts: 445 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I did a thread a couple of weeks ago asking the same question and am going to withdraw from sipp to put into isa which will def get me into 40%
    Though will leave till after the budget 
  • jim8888
    jim8888 Posts: 423 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    I've been thinking about this too, withdrawing from my SIPP at 40% tax to fill ISA allowances going forward. The alternative seems to be not touching it and then my family paying the 40% inheritance tax on the SIPP further down the line (a lot further, I hope!) Of course I could always withdraw £40k a year and spend it, so maybe parking it in an ISA while I learn how to spend money is a potential compromise.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.