We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bond fund to replace VLS

2»

Comments

  • InvesterJones
    InvesterJones Posts: 1,355 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 9 November at 5:10PM
    Bobziz said:
    @masonic I'm looking to do likewise. Any view on a decent corporate fund ? I've been looking at the below which seems decent. Thanks.

    Royal London Shrt Dur Crdt M Acc GB00BJ4KW792

    It's a good fund which I've held in the past and was going to buy again this week, but I've changed my mind to Artemis Short-Duration Strategic Bond. Artemis has the flexibility to hold govt as well as corporate bonds and has more ex-UK than Royal London. That said, their fees and past performance are similar. 

    Maybe I'm looking at the wrong thing, but to me the fees for the artemis fund (0.59 OCF + 0.15 transaction) seem roughly twice that of the royal london (0.35 + 0), but as you say, they're quite different funds in terms of global flexible vs UK corp.
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 28,109 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Bobziz said:
    @masonic I'm looking to do likewise. Any view on a decent corporate fund ? I've been looking at the below which seems decent. Thanks.

    Royal London Shrt Dur Crdt M Acc GB00BJ4KW792

    It's a good fund which I've held in the past and was going to buy again this week, but I've changed my mind to Artemis Short-Duration Strategic Bond. Artemis has the flexibility to hold govt as well as corporate bonds and has more ex-UK than Royal London. That said, their fees and past performance are similar. 

    Maybe I'm looking at the wrong thing, but to me the fees for the artemis fund (0.59 OCF + 0.15 transaction) seem roughly twice that of the royal london (0.35 + 0), but as you say, they're quite different funds in terms of global flexible vs UK corp.
    I'm seeing 0.39%: https://www.trustnet.com/factsheets/O/qqhx/artemis-short-duration-strategic-bond
  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,573 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 9 November at 5:28PM
    Bobziz said:
    @masonic I'm looking to do likewise. Any view on a decent corporate fund ? I've been looking at the below which seems decent. Thanks.

    Royal London Shrt Dur Crdt M Acc GB00BJ4KW792

    It's a good fund which I've held in the past and was going to buy again this week, but I've changed my mind to Artemis Short-Duration Strategic Bond. Artemis has the flexibility to hold govt as well as corporate bonds and has more ex-UK than Royal London. That said, their fees and past performance are similar. 

    Maybe I'm looking at the wrong thing, but to me the fees for the artemis fund (0.59 OCF + 0.15 transaction) seem roughly twice that of the royal london (0.35 + 0), but as you say, they're quite different funds in terms of global flexible vs UK corp.
    Definitely 0.39%. Maybe you are looking at Artemis Strategic Bond, not the short duration fund - that one is 0.59%.
  • Bobziz
    Bobziz Posts: 679 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Bobziz said:
    @masonic I'm looking to do likewise. Any view on a decent corporate fund ? I've been looking at the below which seems decent. Thanks.

    Royal London Shrt Dur Crdt M Acc GB00BJ4KW792

    It's a good fund which I've held in the past and was going to buy again this week, but I've changed my mind to Artemis Short-Duration Strategic Bond. Artemis has the flexibility to hold govt as well as corporate bonds and has more ex-UK than Royal London. That said, their fees and past performance are similar. 
    Good find. I like the gov holdings and the lack of derivatives. Less junk too.
  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,573 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Bobziz said:
    Bobziz said:
    @masonic I'm looking to do likewise. Any view on a decent corporate fund ? I've been looking at the below which seems decent. Thanks.

    Royal London Shrt Dur Crdt M Acc GB00BJ4KW792

    It's a good fund which I've held in the past and was going to buy again this week, but I've changed my mind to Artemis Short-Duration Strategic Bond. Artemis has the flexibility to hold govt as well as corporate bonds and has more ex-UK than Royal London. That said, their fees and past performance are similar. 
    Good find. I like the gov holdings and the lack of derivatives. Less junk too.
    There is plenty of junk in there. There are three co-managers - one focusing on investment grade, one on high grade, one on govt.
    image


  • Beddie
    Beddie Posts: 1,033 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I'd personally go for an active bond fund, as they have tended to justify their fees in my experience.

    Another example to add to the ones above - Royal London Global Bond Opportunities

    https://www.trustnet.com/factsheets/O/E29P/royal-london-global-bond-opportunities-z-inc
  • aroominyork
    aroominyork Posts: 3,573 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Beddie said:
    I'd personally go for an active bond fund, as they have tended to justify their fees in my experience.
    I agree with that for corporate bonds. If you run a Trustnet performance table for Sterling corporate bonds (search on three years to exclude 2021/22 interest rate changes), the index funds are low down the list. I expect quite a few people buy index funds assuming, like with equities, they are the most sensible route. 
  • InvesterJones
    InvesterJones Posts: 1,355 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Bobziz said:
    @masonic I'm looking to do likewise. Any view on a decent corporate fund ? I've been looking at the below which seems decent. Thanks.

    Royal London Shrt Dur Crdt M Acc GB00BJ4KW792

    It's a good fund which I've held in the past and was going to buy again this week, but I've changed my mind to Artemis Short-Duration Strategic Bond. Artemis has the flexibility to hold govt as well as corporate bonds and has more ex-UK than Royal London. That said, their fees and past performance are similar. 

    Maybe I'm looking at the wrong thing, but to me the fees for the artemis fund (0.59 OCF + 0.15 transaction) seem roughly twice that of the royal london (0.35 + 0), but as you say, they're quite different funds in terms of global flexible vs UK corp.
    Definitely 0.39%. Maybe you are looking at Artemis Strategic Bond, not the short duration fund - that one is 0.59%.
    Quite correct, sorry!
  • AVOID AVOID AVOID!!!!
    UNLESS YOU ARE A STUPID LITTLE MASK WEARING SLEAVE ROLLING KNEE BENDER THAT SHOULD OF BEEN TERMINATED BY THE FAKE VACCINE BY NOW!!!!!
    HALE HITTLER!! YOU STUPID USULESS LITTLE EATERS/ DUMB !!!!!! SLAVES
    ENJOY YOUR FINANSUAL CRASH NEXT AUTUM
    Human Rights Act 1998, Article 10

    "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.