We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SIPP - Benefits then work query

2»

Comments

  • DRS1
    DRS1 Posts: 2,035 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Congratulations to the OP on securing employment.

    I just thought I'd mention that the £2,880 (£3.6k) or the earned income limits apply on an "exclusive" basis.
    My wife once got caught on this.  She had paid her £2,880 (£3.6k) but then got a job for the end of the tax year which meant the £3.6k pension contributions had exceeded her earned income and her annual allowance was breached.
    That doesn't sound right - unless she also paid some pension contributions in respect of her employment and so went over the £3600.
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 15,279 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 25 November at 12:48AM
    singhini said:
    Congratulations to the OP on securing employment.

    I just thought I'd mention that the £2,880 (£3.6k) or the earned income limits apply on an "exclusive" basis.
    My wife once got caught on this.  She had paid her £2,880 (£3.6k) but then got a job for the end of the tax year which meant the £3.6k pension contributions had exceeded her earned income and her annual allowance was breached.
    That's a good point and easily done.  
    I don't think it's a point at all - or if it is, I'm not sure quite what the point is.

    What is meant by 'exclusive'? Her tax relievable contributions would have been the higher of her earned income or £3,600, subject to the prevailing annual allowance at the time (and it doesn't sound as if she was within a mile of breaching that!). 

    Good clear explanation here 
    https://www.litrg.org.uk/pensions/paying-pensions/tax-relief-pension-contributions#:~:text=than%20employee%20contributions.-,Relief%20for%20non%2Dearners,goes%20into%20Steven's%20pension%20pot. including:

    Relief at source scheme

    If your pension uses the relief at source method of tax relief and you earn, say, £5,000 in the 2025/26 tax year, you can make a gross contribution of up to £5,000 into that pension. This equates to a net contribution (the amount actually paid in by you) of £4,000, because you make your contribution net of basic rate tax relief (£1,000) which the pension scheme will claim directly from HMRC. If you earn £3,000, you can still make a gross contribution of £3,600 (£2,880 net). In either case, the fact that you do not earn enough to pay any income tax does not prevent the pension scheme claiming the tax relief.

    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 19,262 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    DRS1 said:
    Congratulations to the OP on securing employment.

    I just thought I'd mention that the £2,880 (£3.6k) or the earned income limits apply on an "exclusive" basis.
    My wife once got caught on this.  She had paid her £2,880 (£3.6k) but then got a job for the end of the tax year which meant the £3.6k pension contributions had exceeded her earned income and her annual allowance was breached.
    That doesn't sound right - unless she also paid some pension contributions in respect of her employment and so went over the £3600.
    Marcon said:
    I don't think it's a point at all - or if it is, I'm not sure quite what the point is.

    What is meant by 'exclusive'? Her tax relievable contributions would have been the higher of her earned income or £3,600, subject to the prevailing annual allowance at the time (and it doesn't sound as if she was within a mile of breaching that!). 

    Good clear explanation here 
    https://www.litrg.org.uk/pensions/paying-pensions/tax-relief-pension-contributions#:~:text=than%20employee%20contributions.-,Relief%20for%20non%2Dearners,goes%20into%20Steven's%20pension%20pot. including:

    Relief at source scheme

    If your pension uses the relief at source method of tax relief and you earn, say, £5,000 in the 2025/26 tax year, you can make a gross contribution of up to £5,000 into that pension. This equates to a net contribution (the amount actually paid in by you) of £4,000, because you make your contribution net of basic rate tax relief (£1,000) which the pension scheme will claim directly from HMRC. If you earn £3,000, you can still make a gross contribution of £3,600 (£2,880 net). In either case, the fact that you do not earn enough to pay any income tax does not prevent the pension scheme claiming the tax relief.

    Thank you.

    It was a few years back and I think you may well be correct - jogged the memory - that she had a very small amount of employment pension contribution that landed in the tax year.
    She had paid the full £3.6k (grossed up) around Christmas time, not expecting to work.  Then got some work which made a little bit of extra pension gone in so the limit was breached by a small amount.  Overall still better to have the money than not, even though there was a little tax arising.
    I think it is still a point to be aware of if making maximum (non-working) contribution and then starting employment.
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 15,279 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    DRS1 said:
    Congratulations to the OP on securing employment.

    I just thought I'd mention that the £2,880 (£3.6k) or the earned income limits apply on an "exclusive" basis.
    My wife once got caught on this.  She had paid her £2,880 (£3.6k) but then got a job for the end of the tax year which meant the £3.6k pension contributions had exceeded her earned income and her annual allowance was breached.
    That doesn't sound right - unless she also paid some pension contributions in respect of her employment and so went over the £3600.
    Marcon said:
    I don't think it's a point at all - or if it is, I'm not sure quite what the point is.

    What is meant by 'exclusive'? Her tax relievable contributions would have been the higher of her earned income or £3,600, subject to the prevailing annual allowance at the time (and it doesn't sound as if she was within a mile of breaching that!). 

    Good clear explanation here 
    https://www.litrg.org.uk/pensions/paying-pensions/tax-relief-pension-contributions#:~:text=than%20employee%20contributions.-,Relief%20for%20non%2Dearners,goes%20into%20Steven's%20pension%20pot. including:

    Relief at source scheme

    If your pension uses the relief at source method of tax relief and you earn, say, £5,000 in the 2025/26 tax year, you can make a gross contribution of up to £5,000 into that pension. This equates to a net contribution (the amount actually paid in by you) of £4,000, because you make your contribution net of basic rate tax relief (£1,000) which the pension scheme will claim directly from HMRC. If you earn £3,000, you can still make a gross contribution of £3,600 (£2,880 net). In either case, the fact that you do not earn enough to pay any income tax does not prevent the pension scheme claiming the tax relief.

    Thank you.

    It was a few years back and I think you may well be correct - jogged the memory - that she had a very small amount of employment pension contribution that landed in the tax year.
    She had paid the full £3.6k (grossed up) around Christmas time, not expecting to work.  Then got some work which made a little bit of extra pension gone in so the limit was breached by a small amount.  Overall still better to have the money than not, even though there was a little tax arising.
    I think it is still a point to be aware of if making maximum (non-working) contribution and then starting employment.
    Ah - that makes much more sense! Thank you. Completely agree with your final point.
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • singhini
    singhini Posts: 1,187 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Marcon said:
    singhini said:
    Congratulations to the OP on securing employment.

    I just thought I'd mention that the £2,880 (£3.6k) or the earned income limits apply on an "exclusive" basis.
    My wife once got caught on this.  She had paid her £2,880 (£3.6k) but then got a job for the end of the tax year which meant the £3.6k pension contributions had exceeded her earned income and her annual allowance was breached.
    That's a good point and easily done.  
    I don't think it's a point at all - or if it is, I'm not sure quite what the point is.

    What is meant by 'exclusive'? Her tax relievable contributions would have been the higher of her earned income or £3,600, subject to the prevailing annual allowance at the time (and it doesn't sound as if she was within a mile of breaching that!). 

    Good clear explanation here 
    https://www.litrg.org.uk/pensions/paying-pensions/tax-relief-pension-contributions#:~:text=than%20employee%20contributions.-,Relief%20for%20non%2Dearners,goes%20into%20Steven's%20pension%20pot. including:

    Relief at source scheme

    If your pension uses the relief at source method of tax relief and you earn, say, £5,000 in the 2025/26 tax year, you can make a gross contribution of up to £5,000 into that pension. This equates to a net contribution (the amount actually paid in by you) of £4,000, because you make your contribution net of basic rate tax relief (£1,000) which the pension scheme will claim directly from HMRC. If you earn £3,000, you can still make a gross contribution of £3,600 (£2,880 net). In either case, the fact that you do not earn enough to pay any income tax does not prevent the pension scheme claiming the tax relief.

    Ah OK i thought if earnings were £3,000 a year then the max pension contribution would be £2,400 + tax relief = £3,000  i.e. actual earnings take presidents.

    What If i earn £1,000 a month and so dont pay income tax or NI (therefore my "take home pay" remains £1,000 a month. Can i put that into my SIPP?  -----> effectively what im asking is, can i put £12,0000 into a SIPP and receive £3,000 tax relief? 
    I have a tendency to mute most posts so if your expecting me to respond you might be waiting along time!
  • MallyGirl
    MallyGirl Posts: 7,388 Senior Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    singhini said:
    Marcon said:
    singhini said:
    Congratulations to the OP on securing employment.

    I just thought I'd mention that the £2,880 (£3.6k) or the earned income limits apply on an "exclusive" basis.
    My wife once got caught on this.  She had paid her £2,880 (£3.6k) but then got a job for the end of the tax year which meant the £3.6k pension contributions had exceeded her earned income and her annual allowance was breached.
    That's a good point and easily done.  
    I don't think it's a point at all - or if it is, I'm not sure quite what the point is.

    What is meant by 'exclusive'? Her tax relievable contributions would have been the higher of her earned income or £3,600, subject to the prevailing annual allowance at the time (and it doesn't sound as if she was within a mile of breaching that!). 

    Good clear explanation here 
    https://www.litrg.org.uk/pensions/paying-pensions/tax-relief-pension-contributions#:~:text=than%20employee%20contributions.-,Relief%20for%20non%2Dearners,goes%20into%20Steven's%20pension%20pot. including:

    Relief at source scheme

    If your pension uses the relief at source method of tax relief and you earn, say, £5,000 in the 2025/26 tax year, you can make a gross contribution of up to £5,000 into that pension. This equates to a net contribution (the amount actually paid in by you) of £4,000, because you make your contribution net of basic rate tax relief (£1,000) which the pension scheme will claim directly from HMRC. If you earn £3,000, you can still make a gross contribution of £3,600 (£2,880 net). In either case, the fact that you do not earn enough to pay any income tax does not prevent the pension scheme claiming the tax relief.

    Ah OK i thought if earnings were £3,000 a year then the max pension contribution would be £2,400 + tax relief = £3,000  i.e. actual earnings take presidents.

    What If i earn £1,000 a month and so dont pay income tax or NI (therefore my "take home pay" remains £1,000 a month. Can i put that into my SIPP?  -----> effectively what im asking is, can i put £12,0000 into a SIPP and receive £3,000 tax relief? 
    If you earn £12,000 you can contribute £12,000 gross into a pension. In practice this means that you contribute £9,600 and another £2,400 tax relief is added a little later. You do not need to have paid tax to get tax relief 
    I’m a Senior Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Pensions, Annuities & Retirement Planning, Loans
    & Credit Cards boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com.
    All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.