We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

SMART PARKING, DCB LEGAL court claim 2025

124»

Comments

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 13,570 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    Yes, thats the correct longer one

  • Le_Kirk
    Le_Kirk Posts: 26,370 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    The Particulars of Claim are vague and fail to comply with Civil Procedure Rule 16.4 and Practice Directions 16 paragraphs 3 and 7. The Claimant merely states that the driver “breach of the terms of parking stipulated on the signs” without specifying:
    The terms allegedly breached,
    The duration of any alleged overstay, or

    If the POC are vague and they don't specify the terms allegedly breached, how can you go on to talk about "an overstay" alleged or otherwise?

  • 1505grandad
    1505grandad Posts: 4,425 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 25 April at 11:49AM

    The POC does state the breach:-

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81713803#Comment_81713803
  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 13,570 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 25 April at 11:57AM

    The POC alleged breach is, overstayed free time. ( like the Beavis case. )

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture