We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Not parked wholly within a marked bay - Parking charge issued Vue Hartlepool (6.7m Transit van)

a van of which i am the registered keeper visited the Vue Cinema Hartlepool on the  for a morning viewing (around 10am) it was parked in a virtually empty car park. It is an L4 transit van that is 6.7m long. 

I received in the post a Parking charge, reason for issue 'not parked wholly within a marked bay'

As picture shows the van is longer than their parking bays by quite a margin. 

The car park is free for up to 5 hours, there is no indication that the van exceeded the time and was parked within the white lines down the side. It shows there is a foot or so more at the front of the van but it really would not have made any difference.

The parking notice sign states: all vehicles must be parked wholly within the confines of a single marked parking bay though it makes no reference to vehicles that are not allowed to park.

I have spoken to Vue customer services but they have simply directed me to appeal to the parking crooks Viking Solutions uk ltd via their appeals system.

The charge is £100




Comments

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 10,592 Forumite
    10,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 27 October at 4:47PM
    So Viking Solutions,  an IPC AOS member 

    I would say,  ignore them
  • VanGoes
    VanGoes Posts: 2 Newbie
    First Post
    Thankyou for the advice... ignore completely and dont appeal...
  • James_Poisson
    James_Poisson Posts: 319 Forumite
    100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    VanGoes said:
    Thankyou for the advice... ignore completely and dont appeal...

    What exactly do you think you would put in an appeal to an unregulated scammer that is a member of the IPC, absolutely nothing you say will make a difference, they will just say the T&C's are clear on the plentiful signage:


    Unless the NTK was defective?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.