We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
National Parking Control and DCB Legal
Comments
-
I thought it was clear. All daughter - driver, keeper, defendant. And if you want to call a PA then yes.Gr1pr said:Who is the defendant ? You ir your daughter ? Is she both keeper and driver ? If she is both then you are a personal assistant, helping her, but you cannot take over if she is the defendant
I think you need to be clearer in who is what here1 -
The PA draft as below:
2. The allegation(s) and heads of cost are vague and liability is denied for the sum claimed, or at all. At the very least, interest should be disallowed; the delay in bringing proceedings lies with the Claimant. This also makes retrieving material documents/evidence difficult, which is highly prejudicial. The Defendant seeks fixed costs (CPR 27.14) and a finding of unreasonable conduct and further costs (CPR 46.5). The Defendant has little recollection of events, save as set out below and to admit that they were the registered keeper and the driver of the vehicle.
3. The Defendant is a longstanding member of the David Lloyd Colchester health club, which provides on-site parking facilities exclusively for its members and authorised visitors. As part of the club’s membership benefits, members are granted permission to use the car park while attending the premises for fitness or leisure purposes. On the material date, the Defendant attended the club as a paying member for legitimate use of the facilities and was therefore fully entitled to park on site.1 -
I wrote a David Lloyd defence a few months ago which pointed out that their name is on the signs. That matters. Find my defence.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1 -
NPC ARE MAD using a well known timewaster legal
With a claim that includes the word DAMAGES to scam the courts and you is UTTER CRAP0 -
Search for "David Lloyd Clubs" and change the Sort by from Best Match to Newest; there are a few from July this year.Coupon-mad said:I wrote a David Lloyd defence a few months ago which pointed out that their name is on the signs. That matters. Find my defence.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.5K Spending & Discounts
- 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


