We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Life Insurance Premiums increasing by more than Sum Insured due to Inflation?

Hello, All the life insurance options I am looking at offer to increase the amount covered by inflation, but increase the premium by 1.5 x inflation each year - so the policy gets progressively more expensive - wondered if anyone knew of any better options?  Thankyou

Comments

  • HappyHarry
    HappyHarry Posts: 1,898 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 20 October 2025 at 10:46AM
    You would expect the premiums to increase at a higher rate than the benefit as you will be getting older and potentially less healthier each year.

    This means that each increase in benefit should be more expensive to cover.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser. Any comments I make here are intended for information / discussion only. Nothing I post here should be construed as advice. If you are looking for individual financial advice, please contact a local Independent Financial Adviser.
  • Weighty1
    Weighty1 Posts: 1,237 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There used to be a variety of ways that premiums would increase on inflation linked cover but, as far as I'm aware, every company except VitalityLife use the 'rate of RPI x1.5' calculation these days.  VitalityLife used to increase the premium by inflation plus an additional fixed percentage, depending on the rate of inflation.  I'm not sure if this is still the case but in relatively low inflation times it was typically more punitive than the former calculation.

    As Harry says, people generally get less healthy as they age so it's only fair that the premium increases at a higher percentage than the cover increases.
  • Thank you both.  Looks like a larger level policy to take account of some inflation would be better value.
  • Weighty1
    Weighty1 Posts: 1,237 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thank you both.  Looks like a larger level policy to take account of some inflation would be better value.
    It depends on the purpose of the policy.  Does it matter if it's value is eroded by inflation?

    For example, I have clients who'll want to arrange a lump sum policy which provides family protection to help raise children through to financial independence.  If they need £240,000 to cover the cost of raising the kids over 20-years (£240,000 / 20 / 12(months) = £1,000/month) does it matter if it's not linked to inflation?  In my viewpoint, NO, because as the children near financial independence the money can be spread over a shorter timeframe so th money is protectd from the eroding effects of inflation anyway (£240,000 / 10 / 12(months) = £2,000/month if death occured after 10-years.
  • Howarewetoday
    Howarewetoday Posts: 14 Forumite
    First Post

    Bump

    We've been.contacted by our life insurance company to say that they've reviewed our policy. Our options are to freeze premiums and have benefits halved. With the potential for benefits to become 0 . Or to increase our premiums by x6 to keep our benefits.

    Our policy is indexed linked whole of life.

    We would value any expert advice etc thanks.

    The default is for premiums to be frozen and benefits halved and then less. We have 10 working days to respond or the default applies.

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,397 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Your product is different to the one mentioned by the OP.

    It would be better to start a new thread rather than tag onto an existing one on an unrelated subject.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Howarewetoday
    Howarewetoday Posts: 14 Forumite
    First Post

    Will do thanks

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.