We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Old CCJ and Statue Barred debt

Any advice will be greatly appreciated! 
Sent out a Statue Barred debt email to a debt collection company and received this response back from them. Trying to understand what they are saying and how is the best way to resolve this with a response. Thanks, L 

Comments

  • Grumpelstiltskin
    Grumpelstiltskin Posts: 5,670 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    OK In theory what they say is partially correct, but if they didn't do anything within 6 years of the CCJ being issued  basically they are snookered, they would have to take it back to court and come up with a reason why they didn't do anything within the 6 years. So the answer is just ignore them.
    If you go down to the woods today you better not go alone.
  • MyRealNameToo
    MyRealNameToo Posts: 1,916 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    LA83LA said:
    Any advice will be greatly appreciated! 
    Sent out a Statue Barred debt email to a debt collection company and received this response back from them. Trying to understand what they are saying and how is the best way to resolve this with a response. Thanks, L 
    Statute barring is about the ability to take the matter to court... if it's already been to court then they are correct it cannot be statute barred because that ship has already sailed. 

    That said the initial judgement gives them 6 years for debt enforcement, which it doesnt become statute barred if they want to start recovery action after 6 years they must have the courts approval to do so unless they already have a third party debt order or a charging order. Generally the court will need a compelling reason as to why debt recovery wasnt possible in the first 6 years but is now to authorise them. Just falling between the cracks, forgot about it etc won't wash it and the courts won't give approval. 
  • LA83LA
    LA83LA Posts: 2 Newbie
    First Post
    Appreciate the swift response and clarity gives me ease. Part of me wants to respond in a formal manner so they stop harassing me 
  • fatbelly
    fatbelly Posts: 23,221 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Cashback Cashier
    Point them to Limitation Act 1980 s24

    (Make sure you don't call it Limitations Act)

    See what they say
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.