We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Buying to let in Liverpool


I’m currently based in London and considering a buy-to-let investment in Liverpool, but I’d like to hear some real opinions from people who’ve actually done it.
I’ve run the numbers using a few online calculators and factored in:
- 1 month annual void period
- 5% mortgage rate
So, is this genuinely viable in practice, or just a bit of a gimmick being pushed by estate agents?
What hidden costs, local market risks, or management challenges might I be missing as a remote investor based in London?
Comments
-
Sorry about broken formatting, below is tidier a version.
I’m currently based in London and considering a buy-to-let investment in Liverpool, but I’d like to hear some real opinions from people who’ve actually done it.
I’ve run the numbers using a few online calculators and factored in:
- 1 month annual void period
- 5% mortgage rate
- 10% of rent for maintenance
- 10% agent management feeservice charges where applicabl
- 5% from property price on cosmetic renovation
Even after those deductions, the ROI still comes out around 6-7%, which seems surprisingly solid.So, is this genuinely viable in practice, or just a bit of a gimmick being pushed by estate agents?
What hidden costs, local market risks, or management challenges might I be missing as a remote investor based in London?0 -
BTL can be a viable investment, but you need to make sure you consider all the costs.One big issue with doing it "remotely" can be the repairs/maintenance aspect. If the boiler breaks, or there's a plumbing leak, or whatever, you're reliant upon finding a trustworthy tradesman, who you don't know from Adam, to fix it. If you're local, you can probably attend to minor issues yourself, or else use tradesmen you know and trust (or at least, you can vet them yourself in person).Yes, the letting agent may well have a team of tradesmen they can recommend, but you've still only got their word as to how reliable/fair they are.It may not be an issue, but it's worth bearing in mind.1
-
The only reason people piled into BTL was that the banks were giving out cheap debt to get them on board ( now you have someone on your books with a debt on their main residence and two or three other mortgage debts on top - Bingo! Bonuses all round!) they don`t lend money to make more sensible investments in the stock market. I just don`t see this as being worth the cost or hassle at all, with all the changes to work visas etc. and the major mood music shift on immigration the idea of only 1 month a year voids sounds like magical thinking to me ( more likely cynical marketing based on fantasy numbers)1
-
bonnemotta said:
Sorry about broken formatting, below is tidier a version.
I’m currently based in London and considering a buy-to-let investment in Liverpool, but I’d like to hear some real opinions from people who’ve actually done it.
I’ve run the numbers using a few online calculators and factored in:
- 1 month annual void period
- 5% mortgage rate
- 10% of rent for maintenance
- 10% agent management feeservice charges where applicabl
- 5% from property price on cosmetic renovation
Even after those deductions, the ROI still comes out around 6-7%, which seems surprisingly solid.So, is this genuinely viable in practice, or just a bit of a gimmick being pushed by estate agents?
What hidden costs, local market risks, or management challenges might I be missing as a remote investor based in London?
No indication in your modelling whether you are borrowing significantly to buy ( eg 75%) , whether buying personally or via limited company, and whether you are already a 40% tax payer ( or higher ) on your other sources of income.
Gross income before tax in my mind is not a good enough measure to determine whether BLT is a 'good thing'. Buying personally as a 40% tax payer impacts significantly on the net return after tax (effect of Section 24), which is part of the reason tens of thousands of BTL landlords have/are departing the sector.1 -
Although it is not guaranteed ( neither is the return from BTL), you can make about the same return investing in stocks and shares.
On the downside, the return will vary a lot from one year to the next, and you maybe unlucky and find the markets in a prolonged downturn. However if you hang on long enough, history shows a good return.
On the upside, you do not have the hassle of renting out property. Just a few clicks on the computer and some initial reading and that is it. Very hands off.1 -
poseidon1 said:bonnemotta said:
Sorry about broken formatting, below is tidier a version.
I’m currently based in London and considering a buy-to-let investment in Liverpool, but I’d like to hear some real opinions from people who’ve actually done it.
I’ve run the numbers using a few online calculators and factored in:
- 1 month annual void period
- 5% mortgage rate
- 10% of rent for maintenance
- 10% agent management feeservice charges where applicabl
- 5% from property price on cosmetic renovation
Even after those deductions, the ROI still comes out around 6-7%, which seems surprisingly solid.So, is this genuinely viable in practice, or just a bit of a gimmick being pushed by estate agents?
What hidden costs, local market risks, or management challenges might I be missing as a remote investor based in London?
No indication in your modelling whether you are borrowing significantly to buy ( eg 75%) , whether buying personally or via limited company, and whether you are already a 40% tax payer ( or higher ) on your other sources of income.
Gross income before tax in my mind is not a good enough measure to determine whether BLT is a 'good thing'. Buying personally as a 40% tax payer impacts significantly on the net return after tax (effect of Section 24), which is part of the reason tens of thousands of BTL landlords have/are departing the sector.
Who would they sell to anyway, increased borrowing costs now mean most people can`t afford a BTL on top of their main mortgage? I can only see downside for rents from here.0 -
Liverpool has a very big student population with two universities if you're thinking about the student market.3
-
ReadySteadyPop said:poseidon1 said:bonnemotta said:
Sorry about broken formatting, below is tidier a version.
I’m currently based in London and considering a buy-to-let investment in Liverpool, but I’d like to hear some real opinions from people who’ve actually done it.
I’ve run the numbers using a few online calculators and factored in:
- 1 month annual void period
- 5% mortgage rate
- 10% of rent for maintenance
- 10% agent management feeservice charges where applicabl
- 5% from property price on cosmetic renovation
Even after those deductions, the ROI still comes out around 6-7%, which seems surprisingly solid.So, is this genuinely viable in practice, or just a bit of a gimmick being pushed by estate agents?
What hidden costs, local market risks, or management challenges might I be missing as a remote investor based in London?
No indication in your modelling whether you are borrowing significantly to buy ( eg 75%) , whether buying personally or via limited company, and whether you are already a 40% tax payer ( or higher ) on your other sources of income.
Gross income before tax in my mind is not a good enough measure to determine whether BLT is a 'good thing'. Buying personally as a 40% tax payer impacts significantly on the net return after tax (effect of Section 24), which is part of the reason tens of thousands of BTL landlords have/are departing the sector.
Who would they sell to anyway, increased borrowing costs now mean most people can`t afford a BTL on top of their main mortgage? I can only see downside for rents from here.
My friends have sold one of their rental properties to an owner/occupier and are waiting for a second to complete with a similar buyer.0 -
poseidon1 said:bonnemotta said:
Sorry about broken formatting, below is tidier a version.
I’m currently based in London and considering a buy-to-let investment in Liverpool, but I’d like to hear some real opinions from people who’ve actually done it.
I’ve run the numbers using a few online calculators and factored in:
- 1 month annual void period
- 5% mortgage rate
- 10% of rent for maintenance
- 10% agent management feeservice charges where applicabl
- 5% from property price on cosmetic renovation
Even after those deductions, the ROI still comes out around 6-7%, which seems surprisingly solid.So, is this genuinely viable in practice, or just a bit of a gimmick being pushed by estate agents?
What hidden costs, local market risks, or management challenges might I be missing as a remote investor based in London?
No indication in your modelling whether you are borrowing significantly to buy ( eg 75%) , whether buying personally or via limited company, and whether you are already a 40% tax payer ( or higher ) on your other sources of income.
Gross income before tax in my mind is not a good enough measure to determine whether BLT is a 'good thing'. Buying personally as a 40% tax payer impacts significantly on the net return after tax (effect of Section 24), which is part of the reason tens of thousands of BTL landlords have/are departing the sector.0 -
bonnemotta said:poseidon1 said:bonnemotta said:
Sorry about broken formatting, below is tidier a version.
I’m currently based in London and considering a buy-to-let investment in Liverpool, but I’d like to hear some real opinions from people who’ve actually done it.
I’ve run the numbers using a few online calculators and factored in:
- 1 month annual void period
- 5% mortgage rate
- 10% of rent for maintenance
- 10% agent management feeservice charges where applicabl
- 5% from property price on cosmetic renovation
Even after those deductions, the ROI still comes out around 6-7%, which seems surprisingly solid.So, is this genuinely viable in practice, or just a bit of a gimmick being pushed by estate agents?
What hidden costs, local market risks, or management challenges might I be missing as a remote investor based in London?
No indication in your modelling whether you are borrowing significantly to buy ( eg 75%) , whether buying personally or via limited company, and whether you are already a 40% tax payer ( or higher ) on your other sources of income.
Gross income before tax in my mind is not a good enough measure to determine whether BLT is a 'good thing'. Buying personally as a 40% tax payer impacts significantly on the net return after tax (effect of Section 24), which is part of the reason tens of thousands of BTL landlords have/are departing the sector.
What is your plan to get the net rent ( after corporation tax ) out of the company each year without further dividend tax or PAYE?
Is your 25% to be introduced to the company by way of shareholder loan or shareholder equity?
Who will be handling your annual accounts , corporation tax and Companies House compliance? If not you, is the cost of this annual compliance in your modelling?
If your long term hope is for a decent capital gain on property, what's your plan to avoid a double tax charge on the same property gain ( once within the company on sale and again on company liquidation).
Limited companies sidestep the Section 24 problem with tax relief restriction on loan interest, but then throw up administration, compliance and exit tax issues of their own.
Company BTL ownership is not the 'magic bullet' solution its cracked up to be, as a friend of mind is finding to his cost.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards