We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Adjacent Developer’s land
Comments
-
elsien said:If the brick wall is your boundary, then what you feel they needed to do and what they feel they wanted to do are two different things. And is their decision to make.You wanted them to address the mess and they have,
If you own any of the strip of land between the brick wall and their land then simply put your own fence/boundary marker up,0 -
If it's highway land, they can't build on it. Nor can it be enclosed.
For the title, you go to the Land Registry @ £7. Make sure you use the gov.uk site as the promoted ones cost three times as much.
It would be worth looking at your LA planning portal to see what conditions were attached to land at that junction.
You've no more right to decide what happens on retained land than to what next door does with their garden.
If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing1 -
Fig12 said:user1977 said:Why do you think you have any right to control what they have planted on their own land? Is there anything in your titles about it?
you can download titles from Land Registry0 -
Fig12 said:Surely I have some say as this has now resulted in the privacy on my home being impacted . I have requested to buy the land as they were so uninterested in wanting to maintain it but was advised they can’t due to planning conditions . Surely for such a big impact they have to at least notify me beforehand?Please understand what your rights are, and what they are not.That is their land, and they largely decide what to put there in terms of planting.You may possibly have a right - or may have accumulated one - to light through that window should the opposite occur - they plant a large tree there that covers your window (tho' I doubt you will have accrued that right, since the window has seemingly always been at least partially covered).If that company is citing Planning rules for not being able to sell you a strip of land, then perhaps the best thing is to contact your Planning office? Explain your concerns - a lack of privacy - but please don't suggest that you have any 'rights', or that the owner 'should do something' for you. If you go down that route, you are likely to have a lot of raised eyebrows and rolling eyes.Simply a case of - 'if you can allow this, then I can approach them with a sum'.
0 -
WIAWSNB said:...If that company is citing Planning rules for not being able to sell you a strip of land, then perhaps the best thing is to contact your Planning office? Explain your concerns - a lack of privacy - but please don't suggest that you have any 'rights', or that the owner 'should do something' for you. If you go down that route, you are likely to have a lot of raised eyebrows and rolling eyes.Simply a case of - 'if you can allow this, then I can approach them with a sum'.Worth bearing in mind if it is a planning condition then it would need formally removing (the planners can't just say 'go right ahead') and the process for formally removing or amending the condition would require someone to make a planning application and pay the fee(s). =££££As the planners felt it necessary to condition the application to 'protect' this land it would be a reasonable working assumption that they would want to retain a condition to give equal protection, albeit allowing change of ownership (assuming the developer is correct about this restriction).The planners are likely to be concerned that the OP owning the land might result in a new fence appearing, or maybe a driveway/hardstand, and perhaps a few years down the line an application for a side extension. So they will probably want to set clear ground rules from day one to stop any drift towards further development of the land before it starts.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards