We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Being screwed over by AXA Travel Insurance
Comments
-
MyRealNameToo said:The law requires you to answer all questions honestly and completely, failure to do so can result in a policy being voided and claims avoided even if the false answer is unrelated to the claim.
You are claiming for two medical incidents, at least one seems to be in an area that you have a pre-existing condition given you mentioned using an inhaler. Your insurer is entitled to make enquiries with your doctors to ensure you complied with the law on disclosures. You refusing to allow them to do so is doing nothing but creating a rod for your own back and ultimately will result in the claim being declined which the FOS will almost certainly consider reasonable.
I also suspect you bought it from an intermediary who is selling policies written by Axa rather than it being a trading style of Axa.
but that said, of course there will be breathing difficulties on my medical records - I had Covid in 2022 and was given Paxlovid because I was in the at risk group due to my Crohn’s medication (which II haven't been taking for over a year now!). So I bet they’re going to LOVE seeing that on my records! Isn’t this the perfect example of them fishing to find irrelevant conditions they can use to avoid paying out? I’d argue that nearly EVERYONEs medical files are going to show SOME history of respiratory problems 5 years after a pandemic!!
0 -
The thing is, if you don't provide the information they're asking for they're definitely not going to consider your claim. If you do provide it, yes there's a chance there's something there that invalidates the additional claim you're making, but there's also the chance it satisfies them and they settle your additional claim.
I can't see an outcome where you withhold information and get the extra money you're seeking. I think you're overthinking this on the basis of an off-the-cuff remark from your GP.0 -
Aylesbury_Duck said:
I think you're overthinking this on the basis of an off-the-cuff remark from your GP.0 -
MyRealNameToo said:GPs get absolutely 0 training on insurance during medical school and are even less likely to be kept in formed of changes in insurance legislation and regulation as time goes on. They are therefore simply expressing a personal opinion.
They do seem worryingly uninformed though as most will be doing a number of these fairly regularly. Most are the exact opposite, we send a questionnaire and rather than answer the questionnaire plenty just staple a photocopy of the policyholders complete file to the questionnaire. Inevitably we go back as we arent medical professionals and so can gather some answers from the full file but not the medical opinion ones. Most they time they reply on the second attempt but most will try and send a second invoice for doing so.
Sure it was actually a GP and not one of these Physicians Associates who generally barely know their !!!!!! from their elbow?
but I’ve called back to tell them to answer any questions that AXA has and provide anything they ask for.I feel like my argument is valid though - if they’re going to go hunting through my records looking for a reason to not pay out, they’re going to find something they can use. I doubt anyone travelling today has Covid declared on their travel insurance if they had the typical 7 day run of feeling crappy and then got better again, but Lord help them if they’re insured by AXA and need to claim for Bronchitis or Pneumonia, because 5 years on from a pandemic we’re all going to have some mention of it in our records….
Does that mean no one should be covered by AXA’s rules?0 -
jhend29 said:MyRealNameToo said:The law requires you to answer all questions honestly and completely, failure to do so can result in a policy being voided and claims avoided even if the false answer is unrelated to the claim.
You are claiming for two medical incidents, at least one seems to be in an area that you have a pre-existing condition given you mentioned using an inhaler. Your insurer is entitled to make enquiries with your doctors to ensure you complied with the law on disclosures. You refusing to allow them to do so is doing nothing but creating a rod for your own back and ultimately will result in the claim being declined which the FOS will almost certainly consider reasonable.
I also suspect you bought it from an intermediary who is selling policies written by Axa rather than it being a trading style of Axa.
but that said, of course there will be breathing difficulties on my medical records - I had Covid in 2022 and was given Paxlovid because I was in the at risk group due to my Crohn’s medication (which II haven't been taking for over a year now!). So I bet they’re going to LOVE seeing that on my records! Isn’t this the perfect example of them fishing to find irrelevant conditions they can use to avoid paying out? I’d argue that nearly EVERYONEs medical files are going to show SOME history of respiratory problems 5 years after a pandemic!!
A real fishing exercise would be that they ask for your full medical records if you were to claim your flight was delayed 24 hours. Technically they could and CIDRA would allow them to decline the claim and void the policy were they to discover you had undeclared conditions but I've never seen a travel insurer ask for medical records in relation to flight delays, cancellations, lost luggage etc.
It's standard practice on any medical claim to ask for a medical history. Normally this is in the form of a questionnaire to the GP and it's the GP that decides to overshare. This isnt "fishing" but basic sensible checks. Insurance is broadly priced by the level of risk the insurer is taking. People lie on their applications and so either checks are done to weed them out or we all pay much higher premiums as a fit, no illness 20 year old pays the same as a 70 year old with a history of cancer, heart attacks etc because the insurer cannot check records to see what your health background is.
0 -
Aylesbury_Duck said:The thing is, if you don't provide the information they're asking for they're definitely not going to consider your claim. If you do provide it, yes there's a chance there's something there that invalidates the additional claim you're making, but there's also the chance it satisfies them and they settle your additional claim.
I can't see an outcome where you withhold information and get the extra money you're seeking. I think you're overthinking this on the basis of an off-the-cuff remark from your GP.0 -
jhend29 said:MyRealNameToo said:The law requires you to answer all questions honestly and completely, failure to do so can result in a policy being voided and claims avoided even if the false answer is unrelated to the claim.
You are claiming for two medical incidents, at least one seems to be in an area that you have a pre-existing condition given you mentioned using an inhaler. Your insurer is entitled to make enquiries with your doctors to ensure you complied with the law on disclosures. You refusing to allow them to do so is doing nothing but creating a rod for your own back and ultimately will result in the claim being declined which the FOS will almost certainly consider reasonable.
I also suspect you bought it from an intermediary who is selling policies written by Axa rather than it being a trading style of Axa.I’d argue that nearly EVERYONEs medical files are going to show SOME history of respiratory problems 5 years after a pandemic!!If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales3 -
lincroft1710 said:jhend29 said:MyRealNameToo said:The law requires you to answer all questions honestly and completely, failure to do so can result in a policy being voided and claims avoided even if the false answer is unrelated to the claim.
You are claiming for two medical incidents, at least one seems to be in an area that you have a pre-existing condition given you mentioned using an inhaler. Your insurer is entitled to make enquiries with your doctors to ensure you complied with the law on disclosures. You refusing to allow them to do so is doing nothing but creating a rod for your own back and ultimately will result in the claim being declined which the FOS will almost certainly consider reasonable.
I also suspect you bought it from an intermediary who is selling policies written by Axa rather than it being a trading style of Axa.I’d argue that nearly EVERYONEs medical files are going to show SOME history of respiratory problems 5 years after a pandemic!!1 -
There is no reason not to give them the reports if they requested information about any medical intervention in the previous 5 years. If you don't let them have access they certainly won't pay out.Tell your GP to hand over the information. It's not for them to decide what is relevant to the insurer and what isn't.0
-
If you answered the questions on the application form honestly and truthfully then there should not be a problem.
But , many people decide to think something is not important and don’t include it , only to find out that comes back to bite them if they make a claim.If the form ask for conditions you have seen a go or medical professional about in the last 2 or 5 years and you can’t remember, then you ask your go practice for a copy of your medical records for the last 2 or 5 years.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards