We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
0% balance transfer cc - eligibility checker, which housing option?
Jbn1
Posts: 4 Newbie
in Credit cards
I'm wanting to check my eligibility for 0% balance transfer cards
I don't fit into the accommodation categories.
I live with my partner and our/my children in his house, we are not married and the mortgage is not in my name. I don't pay towards the mortgage. (I realise the obvious pitfalls of this situation but it's by choice and that's not related to my cc debt, we share other bills and are both happy with the set up)
I am therefore not a homeowner, private tenant, council tenant or living with parents. I want to get an accurate as possible response to my eligibility check....what option should I choose?
I don't fit into the accommodation categories.
I live with my partner and our/my children in his house, we are not married and the mortgage is not in my name. I don't pay towards the mortgage. (I realise the obvious pitfalls of this situation but it's by choice and that's not related to my cc debt, we share other bills and are both happy with the set up)
I am therefore not a homeowner, private tenant, council tenant or living with parents. I want to get an accurate as possible response to my eligibility check....what option should I choose?
1
Comments
-
I would ring the provide & get their take.
Life in the slow lane1 -
I think it's the same as living in a husband-owned house, i.e. "homeowner"1
-
I normally say private tenant as I pay rent to my partner in a similar setup to you
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

