We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Horizon - Claim Form Recieved
cmzmse
Posts: 11 Forumite
Hello, The defendant parked into a retail car park shared by multple retailers. The defendant has dealt with defences before but just wants a second pair of eyes on paragraph 3. Is it too vague?
On [date], the Defendant parked at [location] while attending the gym and using both the gym facilities and swimming pool. As a legitimate customer and using the facilities for 16-18 months, the Defendant was entitled to use the car park. The car park signage referencing stay restrictions was not prominent, and the process for extending parking for gym users was unclear and inadequately signposted. The attempt to impose a penalty under these circumstances constitutes an unfair contract term.
The defendant did not use the extension machine as they were unaware they over stayed as it is was so minimal. The POC does not include any details apart from the breach itself.
Also, why do defendants not send emails anymore??
On [date], the Defendant parked at [location] while attending the gym and using both the gym facilities and swimming pool. As a legitimate customer and using the facilities for 16-18 months, the Defendant was entitled to use the car park. The car park signage referencing stay restrictions was not prominent, and the process for extending parking for gym users was unclear and inadequately signposted. The attempt to impose a penalty under these circumstances constitutes an unfair contract term.
The defendant did not use the extension machine as they were unaware they over stayed as it is was so minimal. The POC does not include any details apart from the breach itself.
Also, why do defendants not send emails anymore??
0
Comments
-
Because the CNBC kept losing emails and people got CCJs unfairly. The CNBC's admin is so poor! Also it was time to make the defence more concise to please judges, some of whom were fed up with the long template. So it is now refreshed and fits in MCOL, protecting everyone from CCJ risk.cmzmse said:Also, why do defendants not send emails anymore??
Which solicitor firm? If it's Gladstones the D needs to use the Gladstones special on linked twice in the Template Defence thread.
Show us the POC.
And are you SURE the PCN sum claimed matches the sum on the signs and PCN?
Lots of Horizon ones this Summer don't state the right PC figure.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards