📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New Barclays account to be closed, No reason given

2»

Comments

  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,895 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    trient said:
    ivormonee said:
    trient said:
    some internal exchanges that alluded to suspicion of fraud

    It seems an exceptionally low bar to have bank accounts unilaterally closed on mere suspicion of fraud, without anything more tangible. 
    And that's why, in spite of the usual advice here to leave it and move on, I insisted on taking the issue beyond the mere "computer says no". Of course they never "tipped me off" as to the nature of their initial ruling, but they did eventually carry out an internal investigation and must have realised they were in the wrong. But yes, their unilateral action was completely unwarranted hence I wasn't able to let it go.
    Computer will only say NO when you apply. Anything after account is opened, that is due to human intervention.
    Life in the slow lane
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,927 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    boingy said:
    The "tipping-off" thing always has me a bit puzzled. If you're up to no good and your account gets frozen surely that a pretty big clue that you've been rumbled. You'd have to be daft to think anything else.

    And most people are not up to no good!
    Because they don't want the people who are up to no good to be able to work out how they were compromised, whether it was a particular payment (so they know not to use that way again) or the type of payments (so they know to vary them) etc. Anyone doing a crime will know there is a chance they get rumbled eventually so giving them help on how they were caught is banned 

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.