We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Faulty earring
smileypiley
Posts: 5 Forumite
What are my consumer rights regarding purchasing an earring, then getting home to open the box and find that the earring is broken?
I asked the store to measure the post, which they did behind a counter. They placed the earring straight into the box and I did not see the earring again until I took it out of the box, broken, when I got home.
I asked the store to measure the post, which they did behind a counter. They placed the earring straight into the box and I did not see the earring again until I took it out of the box, broken, when I got home.
0
Comments
-
Take it straight back to the shop.0
-
As Arunmor said, though it is quite difficult to imagine how an earring that was checked by the store staff could be broken.smileypiley said:What are my consumer rights regarding purchasing an earring, then getting home to open the box and find that the earring is broken?
I asked the store to measure the post, which they did behind a counter. They placed the earring straight into the box and I did not see the earring again until I took it out of the box, broken, when I got home.0 -
I have returned broken earrings, I returned a pair to John Lewis where the post on one fell off the first time I tried to put it on - about 20mins after purchase.1
-
Thanks.Arunmor said:Take it straight back to the shop.
I phoned the shop as soon as I realised and they asked me to take it back to the shop, which I did.
They agreed that it was broken and said they had to send it away to assess how and why it was broken.
Result came back within days, saying that the £60 gold flat backed stud had been cross threaded and they said that I had done it, as the shop would not sell faulty jewellery. I never checked whether it was cross threaded in the shop just looked at it.
Its my word against there’s.
0 -
How was the earring broken, had the post fallen off, or did the flat back no longer screw on?smileypiley said:
Thanks.Arunmor said:Take it straight back to the shop.
I phoned the shop as soon as I realised and they asked me to take it back to the shop, which I did.
They agreed that it was broken and said they had to send it away to assess how and why it was broken.
Result came back within days, saying that the £60 gold flat backed stud had been cross threaded and they said that I had done it, as the shop would not sell faulty jewellery. I never checked whether it was cross threaded in the shop just looked at it.
Its my word against there’s.
If they took the back off to measure the post for you, it's possible they cross threaded it - but proving that is going to be nigh on impossible.0 -
Why didn't you say all that in your first post?smileypiley said:
Thanks.Arunmor said:Take it straight back to the shop.
I phoned the shop as soon as I realised and they asked me to take it back to the shop, which I did.
They agreed that it was broken and said they had to send it away to assess how and why it was broken.
Result came back within days, saying that the £60 gold flat backed stud had been cross threaded and they said that I had done it, as the shop would not sell faulty jewellery. I never checked whether it was cross threaded in the shop just looked at it.
Its my word against there’s.1 -
When I took the earring out of the box, the flat back was still inside (not attached to the earring as you’d expect). Like you said, when screwed together, it did not attach (not in my ear at any point).Emmia said:
How was the earring broken, had the post fallen off, or did the flat back no longer screw on?smileypiley said:
Thanks.Arunmor said:Take it straight back to the shop.
I phoned the shop as soon as I realised and they asked me to take it back to the shop, which I did.
They agreed that it was broken and said they had to send it away to assess how and why it was broken.
Result came back within days, saying that the £60 gold flat backed stud had been cross threaded and they said that I had done it, as the shop would not sell faulty jewellery. I never checked whether it was cross threaded in the shop just looked at it.
Its my word against there’s.
If they took the back off to measure the post for you, it's possible they cross threaded it - but proving that is going to be nigh on impossible.
My word against there’s. I have asked for cctv footage, but has been declined.
The earring was sold as faulty (or poor quality), but how can I prove this?0 -
Is there a missing "not" in that sentence?smileypiley said:
The earring was sold as faulty (or poor quality), but how can I prove this?
1 -
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/section/19
(14)For the purposes of subsections (3)(b) and (c) and (4), goods which do not conform to the contract at any time within the period of six months beginning with the day on which the goods were delivered to the consumer must be taken not to have conformed to it on that day.
(15)Subsection (14) does not apply if—
(a)it is established that the goods did conform to the contract on that day, or
(b)its application is incompatible with the nature of the goods or with how they fail to conform to the contract.
They have demonstrated what the issue is, not who caused it and I don't see how they possibly could. Entitlement is to a repair/replacement and if one is not forthcoming reject for a full refund (within 6 months of delivery).
(Short term right to reject best avoided due to the lack of reverse burden of proof).In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces1 -
You don't normally get "right to reject" for earrings due to hygiene issues and these were bought in-store, so already have more limited refund rights generally.https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/section/19
(14)For the purposes of subsections (3)(b) and (c) and (4), goods which do not conform to the contract at any time within the period of six months beginning with the day on which the goods were delivered to the consumer must be taken not to have conformed to it on that day.(15)Subsection (14) does not apply if—(a)it is established that the goods did conform to the contract on that day, or(b)its application is incompatible with the nature of the goods or with how they fail to conform to the contract.
They have demonstrated what the issue is, not who caused it and I don't see how they possibly could. Entitlement is to a repair/replacement and if one is not forthcoming reject for a full refund (within 6 months of delivery).
(Short term right to reject best avoided due to the lack of reverse burden of proof).1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

