We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Home insurance question for joint ownership?

13»

Comments

  • Smithcom
    Smithcom Posts: 265 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Smithcom said:
    Smithcom said:
    It's not an exactly identical situation, but see Decision Reference DRN6717602  re problematic claim regarding insurable interest.

    There's other cases (and legal discussions) regarding the issue of insurable interest on the internet.

    MyRealNameToo - your advice on this forum is genuinely worrying, and assumes the benevolent nature of insurers to pay for a claim beyond the extent of their policyholder's loss.

    In my extensive experience, I haven't come across too many benevolent insurers.

    SC 
    That is a totally unrelated matter, they insured a property under a landlord policy when actually a LTD owned the property. I already acknowledged there are many cases on the FOS and several on here where people have done similarly. 

    We are explicitly talking about co-ownership and stating that the insured can only claim up to their proportion of ownership despite the policy documents stating they are insured for the full rebuild value of the property with no reference to proportion owned. Remembering that ownership is not the only mechanism that creates insurable interest.

    It would be unprudent to rely on benevolence of an insurer but there are plenty of examples on here of it... look at any thread on NCDs and you'll see many accounts of insurers allowing the widow(er) to inherit their deceased spouses entitlement.  You can however rely on legislation and on the terms in the policy book rather than benevolence. 
    Yes, an insurer may allow a widow(er) to take over an NCD, but this is a long-standing industry tradition, and does not affect the insurer's claims pot.   Insurers currently are working very hard to avoid 'claims leakage'

    You seem to forget how the claims pot is filled in the first place.


    It does surprise me that you want to keep this thread running.  I wouldn't, if I were you.

    Bear in mind that:

    1. Transfer of NCD between spouses is a longstanding industry tradition
    2. Whilst such transfer of NCD might reduce the insurer's premium, there's a difference between a justifiable premium discount/reduction, and claims leakage.
    3. Often, the reduced premium is actually with another insurer (if the spouse insures with another firm).

    Going back to the initial query, let me know if you need any further information on the issue of insurable interest, and the potential consequences of getting it wrong

    SC

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.