smart parking DCB legal ltd

Outside_inn

Hi people is there anybody who could advise me on a the process im in a lot of physical and mental pain and my concentration is very limited.

so far I have submitted the aos within the 14day time frame and now working within the 28 day window before a CCJ would have been issued against a parking fine from 2022 which I have had no other notifications on until a letter from for 300.60 for apparently having insufficient paid time.

The letter is from Civil national business centre its an official document from the county court.

ive read some posts but im struggling to process and get to the next stage within the 28 day window.

here's a letter AI created if anybody could suggest its suitability id be most grateful County Court Business Centre – Defence

Claim Number: [Insert Claim Number]

Between: Smart Parking Ltd (Claimant)

and [Full Name of Defendant] (Defendant)

Defence

1. The Defendant denies liability for the entirety of the claim.

2. The Defendant has no recollection of the day in question and no evidence has been provided by the Claimant to clearly establish the alleged contravention.

3. The Defendant neither admits nor denies being the driver and puts the Claimant to strict proof. The Claimant must demonstrate compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA) Schedule 4 if they wish to hold the registered keeper liable.

4. The Claimant is put to strict proof of the following:

   - Reliability and accuracy of the ANPR system, including entry and exit timestamps.

   - Full unredacted payment machine records for the date of the alleged contravention.

   - Evidence that signage at the car park was clear, prominent, and capable of forming a legally binding contract.

5. The Defendant avers that the Claimant’s Particulars of Claim are sparse, vague, and fail to disclose a cause of action with clarity.

6. The sum claimed includes an additional “debt recovery” or similar fee. Such costs are an abuse of process, have not been incurred, and are unrecoverable under case law (e.g., ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67).

7. For the above reasons, the Defendant requests that the claim be dismissed in its entirety.

Statement of Truth

I believe that the facts stated in this defence are true.

Signed: ___________________________

Dated: ___________________________

thanks once again 

Gr1pr

Totally out of date and incorrect,  especially the statement of truth that was retired several years ago 

Read a few recent Smart Parking DCB Legal cases over the last 3 weeks only, on here,  that are using the template defence by coupon mad in announcements near the top of the forum,  you are adapting paragraphs 2 & 3 only 

Post the Issue date and AOS date below

Coupon-mad

Outside_inn said:

Hi people is there anybody who could advise me on a the process im in a lot of physical and mental pain and my concentration is very limited.

so far I have submitted the aos within the 14day time frame and now working within the 28 day window before a CCJ would have been issued against a parking fine from 2022 which I have had no other notifications on until a letter from for 300.60 for apparently having insufficient paid time.

The letter is from Civil national business centre its an official document from the county court.

ive read some posts but im struggling to process and get to the next stage within the 28 day window.

here's a letter AI created if anybody could suggest its suitability id be most grateful County Court Business Centre – Defence

Claim Number: [Insert Claim Number]

Between: Smart Parking Ltd (Claimant)

and [Full Name of Defendant] (Defendant)

Defence

1. The Defendant denies liability for the entirety of the claim.

2. The Defendant has no recollection of the day in question and no evidence has been provided by the Claimant to clearly establish the alleged contravention.

3. The Defendant neither admits nor denies being the driver and puts the Claimant to strict proof. The Claimant must demonstrate compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (POFA) Schedule 4 if they wish to hold the registered keeper liable.

4. The Claimant is put to strict proof of the following:

   - Reliability and accuracy of the ANPR system, including entry and exit timestamps.

   - Full unredacted payment machine records for the date of the alleged contravention.

   - Evidence that signage at the car park was clear, prominent, and capable of forming a legally binding contract.

5. The Defendant avers that the Claimant’s Particulars of Claim are sparse, vague, and fail to disclose a cause of action with clarity.

6. The sum claimed includes an additional “debt recovery” or similar fee. Such costs are an abuse of process, have not been incurred, and are unrecoverable under case law (e.g., ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67).

7. For the above reasons, the Defendant requests that the claim be dismissed in its entirety.

Statement of Truth

I believe that the facts stated in this defence are true.

Absolutely not AI. That us awful. It hasn't got any facts or proper arguments and the statement of truth is 5 years out of date!

Use the Template Defence.

Even easier, just copy any other Smart Parking defence near yours on the forum pages one or two, right now.