We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
LGPS AVC 25% TFLS calculation
Comments
-
Aylesbury_Duck said:Silvertabby said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Jumping onto this thread, I have a question.
As I understand it, the maximum TFLS I can take from my AVC is 25% of the combined value of the notional LGPS value (20x today's value) plus the AVC value. Is that correct? I know there's an absolute upper limit, but I'm not near that.
In my case, as at now, my LGPS entitlement is £13,208 and my AVC is worth £166,614. By my calculations, that would make the maximum TFLS ((£13,208 x 20) + £166,614)) / 4 = £107,694
However, when I use the calculator tool, it generates a sum of £88,053. Can someone explain the substantial difference, please? There's no LGPS lump sum involved.
I'm several years away from possible retirement, and more than 10 years away from touching the LGPS. The plan as things stand is to begin drawing the LGPS a little earlier than 67 and use the residual AVC to top up the otherwise reduced annual pension.I’ve tried to think whether that would be beneficial to go down that path of reductions to LGPS through early retirement, supplemented by buying extra via AVC.Can’t quite get my head around whether that would make sense, so instead I’ve just been concentrating on ISA+SIPP for early retirement - and then LGPS+AVC for SPA.0 -
seans_elysees said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Silvertabby said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Jumping onto this thread, I have a question.
As I understand it, the maximum TFLS I can take from my AVC is 25% of the combined value of the notional LGPS value (20x today's value) plus the AVC value. Is that correct? I know there's an absolute upper limit, but I'm not near that.
In my case, as at now, my LGPS entitlement is £13,208 and my AVC is worth £166,614. By my calculations, that would make the maximum TFLS ((£13,208 x 20) + £166,614)) / 4 = £107,694
However, when I use the calculator tool, it generates a sum of £88,053. Can someone explain the substantial difference, please? There's no LGPS lump sum involved.
I'm several years away from possible retirement, and more than 10 years away from touching the LGPS. The plan as things stand is to begin drawing the LGPS a little earlier than 67 and use the residual AVC to top up the otherwise reduced annual pension.I’ve tried to think whether that would be beneficial to go down that path of reductions to LGPS through early retirement, supplemented by buying extra via AVC.Can’t quite get my head around whether that would make sense, so instead I’ve just been concentrating on ISA+SIPP for early retirement - and then LGPS+AVC for SPA.
With your plan, I suppose you need to consider the potential tax implications and if you're in the fortunate position where you might be a higher rate taxpayer at some point in retirement or for all of it, smoothing out your income to try and reduce the amount of annual income that would be taxed at 40%. That might require more agility than what looks like a fairly rigid (albeit sensible) plan.1 -
seans_elysees said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Silvertabby said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Jumping onto this thread, I have a question.
As I understand it, the maximum TFLS I can take from my AVC is 25% of the combined value of the notional LGPS value (20x today's value) plus the AVC value. Is that correct? I know there's an absolute upper limit, but I'm not near that.
In my case, as at now, my LGPS entitlement is £13,208 and my AVC is worth £166,614. By my calculations, that would make the maximum TFLS ((£13,208 x 20) + £166,614)) / 4 = £107,694
However, when I use the calculator tool, it generates a sum of £88,053. Can someone explain the substantial difference, please? There's no LGPS lump sum involved.
I'm several years away from possible retirement, and more than 10 years away from touching the LGPS. The plan as things stand is to begin drawing the LGPS a little earlier than 67 and use the residual AVC to top up the otherwise reduced annual pension.I’ve tried to think whether that would be beneficial to go down that path of reductions to LGPS through early retirement, supplemented by buying extra via AVC.Can’t quite get my head around whether that would make sense, so instead I’ve just been concentrating on ISA+SIPP for early retirement - and then LGPS+AVC for SPA.
Age 67 onwards: LGPS + small DB pension + State Pension + (whatever is left from my AVC + ISA)
I anticipate that all of my AVC will be taken as cash (within tax free limits and no requirement to convert any to a pension).
Based on my current forecasting I stay as a basic rate tax payer. Tax rates do need to be factored in, i.e. whether you will be paying 20% or 40% tax in retirement.
You'd need to work out when the break even point is for you (i.e. comparing the two different ages of beginning to draw your LGPS pension. The earlier you take your LGPS pension the greater number of years but a lower amount versus the higher pension but starting later) and whether you expect to live beyond that break even point/age, if you do, then you would be better taking your LGPS pension later on.
For example, say you run the scenario above and it says the breakeven point is 82 years of age. If you expect to live beyond that age then you would be better to take your LGPS pension later.
The above is based on current pension rules and I'm fully aware a lot may change.2 -
SarahB16 said:seans_elysees said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Silvertabby said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Jumping onto this thread, I have a question.
As I understand it, the maximum TFLS I can take from my AVC is 25% of the combined value of the notional LGPS value (20x today's value) plus the AVC value. Is that correct? I know there's an absolute upper limit, but I'm not near that.
In my case, as at now, my LGPS entitlement is £13,208 and my AVC is worth £166,614. By my calculations, that would make the maximum TFLS ((£13,208 x 20) + £166,614)) / 4 = £107,694
However, when I use the calculator tool, it generates a sum of £88,053. Can someone explain the substantial difference, please? There's no LGPS lump sum involved.
I'm several years away from possible retirement, and more than 10 years away from touching the LGPS. The plan as things stand is to begin drawing the LGPS a little earlier than 67 and use the residual AVC to top up the otherwise reduced annual pension.I’ve tried to think whether that would be beneficial to go down that path of reductions to LGPS through early retirement, supplemented by buying extra via AVC.Can’t quite get my head around whether that would make sense, so instead I’ve just been concentrating on ISA+SIPP for early retirement - and then LGPS+AVC for SPA.
Age 67 onwards: LGPS + small DB pension + State Pension + (whatever is left from my AVC + ISA)
I anticipate that all of my AVC will be taken as cash (within tax free limits and no requirement to convert any to a pension).
Based on my current forecasting I stay as a basic rate tax payer. Tax rates do need to be factored in, i.e. whether you will be paying 20% or 40% tax in retirement.
You'd need to work out when the break even point is for you (i.e. comparing the two different ages of beginning to draw your LGPS pension. The earlier you take your LGPS pension the greater number of years but a lower amount versus the higher pension but starting later) and whether you expect to live beyond that break even point/age, if you do, then you would be better taking your LGPS pension later on.
For example, say you run the scenario above and it says the breakeven point is 82 years of age. If you expect to live beyond that age then you would be better to take your LGPS pension later.
The above is based on current pension rules and I'm fully aware a lot may change.Thanks for that.
Lots of variables in there as to be expected and especially working out a break even based on expected life expectancy makes it especially tricky to have confidence.I’ve got a good while to go yet anyway so will just keep contributing for now and will get a better indication of the reality of the options when I get a lot closer to retirement.1 -
seans_elysees said:SarahB16 said:seans_elysees said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Silvertabby said:Aylesbury_Duck said:Jumping onto this thread, I have a question.
As I understand it, the maximum TFLS I can take from my AVC is 25% of the combined value of the notional LGPS value (20x today's value) plus the AVC value. Is that correct? I know there's an absolute upper limit, but I'm not near that.
In my case, as at now, my LGPS entitlement is £13,208 and my AVC is worth £166,614. By my calculations, that would make the maximum TFLS ((£13,208 x 20) + £166,614)) / 4 = £107,694
However, when I use the calculator tool, it generates a sum of £88,053. Can someone explain the substantial difference, please? There's no LGPS lump sum involved.
I'm several years away from possible retirement, and more than 10 years away from touching the LGPS. The plan as things stand is to begin drawing the LGPS a little earlier than 67 and use the residual AVC to top up the otherwise reduced annual pension.I’ve tried to think whether that would be beneficial to go down that path of reductions to LGPS through early retirement, supplemented by buying extra via AVC.Can’t quite get my head around whether that would make sense, so instead I’ve just been concentrating on ISA+SIPP for early retirement - and then LGPS+AVC for SPA.
Age 67 onwards: LGPS + small DB pension + State Pension + (whatever is left from my AVC + ISA)
I anticipate that all of my AVC will be taken as cash (within tax free limits and no requirement to convert any to a pension).
Based on my current forecasting I stay as a basic rate tax payer. Tax rates do need to be factored in, i.e. whether you will be paying 20% or 40% tax in retirement.
You'd need to work out when the break even point is for you (i.e. comparing the two different ages of beginning to draw your LGPS pension. The earlier you take your LGPS pension the greater number of years but a lower amount versus the higher pension but starting later) and whether you expect to live beyond that break even point/age, if you do, then you would be better taking your LGPS pension later on.
For example, say you run the scenario above and it says the breakeven point is 82 years of age. If you expect to live beyond that age then you would be better to take your LGPS pension later.
The above is based on current pension rules and I'm fully aware a lot may change.Thanks for that.
Lots of variables in there as to be expected and especially working out a break even based on expected life expectancy makes it especially tricky to have confidence.I’ve got a good while to go yet anyway so will just keep contributing for now and will get a better indication of the reality of the options when I get a lot closer to retirement.
My only observations on your plan are:
It seems you wish to retire at 55 using your DC pot (from 57) until you're 68 so do make sure you have sufficient funds in that DC pot. I'm not clear on how big your DC pot is but this needs to fund you from 57 to 68 and perhaps use ISAs from 55 to 57 as you can't draw your DC pot until you're 57 based on your age.
You don't need to work out a break-even point you'd simply model taking your LGPS at age 68 versus taking it at say 63 and the financial modelling may say the break-even age is 80 (let's just say) and you think you might live to the age of say 85 then this simply confirms you are doing the right thing taking your LGPS pension at 68 and not earlier.
0 -
Just a point to be aware of:
Not all LGPS areas allow a deferred member to use any excess AVC to purchase additional LGPS benefits even though retirees from active membership can.
Mine didn't, which as it happens made no difference to me, but wasn't something I was aware of from reading national LGPS scheme website.1 -
AlanP_2 said:Just a point to be aware of:
Not all LGPS areas allow a deferred member to use any excess AVC to purchase additional LGPS benefits even though retirees from active membership can.
Mine didn't, which as it happens made no difference to me, but wasn't something I was aware of from reading national LGPS scheme website.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards